Resonant Layer Equations
In a conventional tokamak plasma, the Lundquist number, , which is the nominal ratio of the plasma inertia term to the resistive diffusion term in the plasma Ohm's law [14], is very much greater than unity. In fact, according to Table 1.5, typically exceeds in a tokamak fusion reactor.
However, a resonant layer is
characterized by a balance between plasma inertia and resistive diffusion [17]. Such a balance is
only possible if the layer is very narrow in the radial direction (because a narrow layer enhances radial derivatives, and, thereby, enhances
resistive diffusion). Let us define the stretched radial variable [2]
|
(5.56) |
Assuming that
in the layer (i.e., assuming that the layer thickness is roughly of order
),
and making use of the fact that , we deduce that
.
Hence, the linear equations (5.39)–(5.42) reduce to the following set of resonant layer equations [7,15]:
Here,
Table: 5.1
Dimensionless parameters appearing in resonant layer equations for a low-field and a high-field
tokamak reactor. See Equations (4.5), (5.65), (5.66), (5.53), (5.54), and (4.65).
|
Low-Field |
High-Field |
|
5.0 |
12.0 |
|
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
3.02 |
2.26 |
|
874 |
874 |
|
287 |
287 |
|
0.635 |
0.635 |
|
0.128 |
0.128 |
|
Table 5.1 gives estimates for the values of the dimensionless parameters that characterize the resonant layer equations, (5.57)–(5.60), in a low-field
and a high-field tokamak fusion reactor. (See Chapter 1.) These estimates are made using the following assumptions:
(low-field) or
(high-field),
,
,
(where and are the deuteron and triton masses, respectively),
, , , (where is the minor radius of the plasma), , ,
, and
. The parallel energy diffusivities,
and
, are estimated from Equations (2.319) and (2.320), respectively,
using
, which is the typical parallel wavenumber of the tearing perturbation at the edge of a resistive layer
whose characteristic thickness is
. Note that
, which allows us to neglect the
parallel transport terms (i.e., the terms involving
) in Equation (5.58). The neglect of these terms is justified because the linear layer width is much less than the critical width,
|
(5.68) |
below which parallel transport is unable to constrain the perturbed electron temperature to be constant along magnetic field-lines [12].