Resonant Layer Equations
In a conventional tokamak plasma, the Lundquist number,
, which is the nominal ratio of the plasma inertia term to the resistive diffusion term in the plasma Ohm's law [14], is very much greater than unity. In fact, according to Table 1.5,
typically exceeds
in a tokamak fusion reactor.
However, a resonant layer is
characterized by a balance between plasma inertia and resistive diffusion [17]. Such a balance is
only possible if the layer is very narrow in the radial direction (because a narrow layer enhances radial derivatives, and, thereby, enhances
resistive diffusion). Let us define the stretched radial variable [2]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e05e/7e05e4286dd5e4640c8e31c5861786f0f005f462" alt="$\displaystyle X = S^{1/3}\,\hat{x}.$" |
(5.56) |
Assuming that
in the layer (i.e., assuming that the layer thickness is roughly of order
),
and making use of the fact that
, we deduce that
.
Hence, the linear equations (5.39)–(5.42) reduce to the following set of resonant layer equations [7,15]:
Here,
Table: 5.1
Dimensionless parameters appearing in resonant layer equations for a low-field and a high-field
tokamak reactor. See Equations (4.5), (5.65), (5.66), (5.53), (5.54), and (4.65).
|
Low-Field |
High-Field |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09d12/09d1242d2cb3d9cf1d29d53e7d8367c088db4add" alt="$B({\rm T})$" |
5.0 |
12.0 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2d91/a2d91f8cb2ef1df4c690517ef67b76143d906e9f" alt="$\tau $" |
1.0 |
1.0 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/665bf/665bffdb1b2f4dcf19bd063fb8cf3517bda521a1" alt="$Q_\ast $" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af169/af1692adb811860813c2c5b798a71855f7f7c1a0" alt="$2.00$" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6621d/6621d3c881ee686cceff75f2921d8aa6bfa887e7" alt="$1.50$" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5692e/5692e0e9c583955a3d3cdbb9b952305df5279ad2" alt="$D$" |
3.02 |
2.26 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1842a/1842ac2889d16ada0d1194b3170c7a4a8f01056c" alt="$P_\varphi$" |
874 |
874 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2f1c/a2f1c4b7f559a80eb49d1081721fa61f7f8cbbbc" alt="$P_\perp$" |
287 |
287 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba939/ba9391b262b97735dda7748946f1a452fbeab9ff" alt="$\hat{P}_\parallel$" |
0.635 |
0.635 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a20f/4a20f4e6f702b8f0ea08b255650245f49772785c" alt="$c_\beta$" |
0.128 |
0.128 |
|
Table 5.1 gives estimates for the values of the dimensionless parameters that characterize the resonant layer equations, (5.57)–(5.60), in a low-field
and a high-field tokamak fusion reactor. (See Chapter 1.) These estimates are made using the following assumptions:
(low-field) or
(high-field),
,
,
(where
and
are the deuteron and triton masses, respectively),
,
,
,
(where
is the minor radius of the plasma),
,
,
, and
. The parallel energy diffusivities,
and
, are estimated from Equations (2.319) and (2.320), respectively,
using
, which is the typical parallel wavenumber of the tearing perturbation at the edge of a resistive layer
whose characteristic thickness is
. Note that
, which allows us to neglect the
parallel transport terms (i.e., the terms involving
) in Equation (5.58). The neglect of these terms is justified because the linear layer width is much less than the critical width,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1555/c15559e7bc0294d0d65fdc0f15d11b6f61073410" alt="$\displaystyle W_d= \sqrt{8}\,\left(\frac{\tau_\parallel}{\tau_\perp}\right)^{1/4}\left(\frac{1}{\epsilon_s\,s_s\,n}\right)^{1/2}r_s,$" |
(5.68) |
below which parallel transport is unable to constrain the perturbed electron temperature to be constant along magnetic field-lines [12].