We saw in Equation (2.16) that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd62a/cd62a2837699a51b6a11a9eaf2bc676ed7e96f41" alt="$\displaystyle \frac{{\bf r}- {\bf r}' }
{\vert{\bf r} - {\bf r}'\vert^3} = -\nabla\!\left(\frac{1}{\vert{\bf r} - {\bf r'}\vert}\right).$" |
(2.249) |
This equation can be combined with the generalized Biot-Savart law, (2.248), to give
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d23f/2d23fdd84ce3a92a5ea13d83fe09f881bc75a62c" alt="$\displaystyle {\bf B}({\bf r}) = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\int\nabla\!\left(\frac{1}{\vert{\bf r} - {\bf r'}\vert}\right)\times {\bf j}({\bf r}')\,dV'.$" |
(2.250) |
It follows that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1769/e1769fe0d3f06c8b4be33e9033f72b9a631312ac" alt="$\displaystyle {\bf B} = \nabla\times {\bf A},$" |
(2.251) |
where
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96fba/96fbabb6d7d12b4a33845db2ee12d8a75dd54e22" alt="$\displaystyle {\bf A}({\bf r})= \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\int\frac{{\bf j}({\bf r}')}{\vert{\bf r}-{\bf r}'\vert}\,dV'.$" |
(2.252) |
(See Section A.24.)
Here, the vector field
is known as the magnetic vector potential.
It is possible to prove that the
magnetic vector potential defined in the previous equation is a divergence-free field.
Note that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af9ca/af9cabbbdba0f881ce11e9f151d5ed9bfaa6623b" alt="$\displaystyle \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\! \left(\frac{1}{\vert{\bf r} - {\bf ...
...c{\partial}{\partial x'} \!\left(\frac{1}{\vert{\bf r} - {\bf r}'\vert}\right),$" |
(2.253) |
which implies that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f87b/1f87b2139a057d120277c183317176f9c2e1c81f" alt="$\displaystyle \nabla\left( \frac{1}{\vert{\bf r} - {\bf r}'\vert}\right) = - \nabla'
\left( \frac{1}{\vert{\bf r} - {\bf r}'\vert}\right),$" |
(2.254) |
where
is the operator
. (See Section A.19.) Taking the divergence of Equation (2.252), and making use of
the previous relation, we obtain
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/faac4/faac420342aa99da9db3e020461bf2842ff7aa5d" alt="$\displaystyle \nabla\cdot{\bf A} = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi} \int {\bf j}({\bf r'})\cd...
...\bf r'})\cdot
\nabla'\left( \frac{1}{\vert{\bf r} - {\bf r}'\vert}\right)\,dV'.$" |
(2.255) |
Now,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa556/fa556e5bafeab296c4f94992a94f7fe29405d275" alt="$\displaystyle \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} g \,\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\,dx = \...
...infty}^{\infty} - \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}
f\,\frac{\partial g}{\partial x}\,dx.$" |
(2.256) |
However, if
as
then we can neglect the
first term on the right-hand side of the previous equation, and write
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c52f/4c52f200e390846303c382b9a99597863040132e" alt="$\displaystyle \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} g\, \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}\,dx = -
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f\, \frac{\partial g}{\partial x}\,dx.$" |
(2.257) |
A simple generalization of this result yields
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/968b8/968b812456e1abb206ed998c181188447d12715e" alt="$\displaystyle \int {\bf g}\cdot\nabla f\,dV = - \int f\,\nabla\cdot {\bf g}\,dV,$" |
(2.258) |
provided that
as
, etc cetera.
Thus, Equation (2.255)
yields
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62016/62016344f8856540c39535e0fa8e8a7d782ccd6d" alt="$\displaystyle \nabla\cdot{\bf A} = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\int \frac{\nabla' \cdot {\bf j}({\bf r}') }
{\vert{\bf r} - {\bf r}'\vert} \,dV',$" |
(2.259) |
provided that
is bounded as
. Now, the flux of electric charge out of a surface
, enclosing a volume
, is
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5b9f/c5b9fd141ef9fb728ca99f0b567a33627740347e" alt="$\displaystyle \oint_S {\bf j}\cdot d{\bf S} = \int_V \nabla\cdot{\bf j}\,dV,$" |
(2.260) |
where use has been made of the divergence theorem. (See Section A.20.)
However, for a steady current distribution, this flux must be zero, otherwise positive or negative electric
charge would build up inside
. Moreover, the flux must be zero for all possible volumes,
, which implies that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20f67/20f676ea1cb013db09dad08fbb675683006a66ef" alt="$\displaystyle \nabla\cdot{\bf j} = 0$" |
(2.261) |
for a steady current distribution. Hence, we deduce from Equation (2.259) that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa1a2/fa1a2bcb83b0de9dd48b71b24e4361b11e753794" alt="$\displaystyle \nabla\cdot{\bf A} = 0$" |
(2.262) |
for a steady current distribution.