Next: Inviscid Flow Past a Up: Incompressible Inviscid Fluid Dynamics Previous: Two-Dimensional Irrotational Flow in

# Inviscid Flow Past a Cylindrical Obstacle

Consider the steady flow pattern produced when an impenetrable rigid cylindrical obstacle is placed in a uniformly flowing, incompressible, inviscid fluid, with the cylinder orientated such that its axis is normal to the flow. For instance, suppose that the radius of the cylinder is , and that its axis corresponds to the line . Furthermore, let the unperturbed fluid velocity be of magnitude , and be directed parallel to the -axis. Now, we expect the flow pattern to remain unperturbed very far away from the cylinder. In other words, we expect as , which corresponds to a boundary condition on the stream function of the form (see Section 5.9)
 (526)

Given that the fluid velocity field a large distance upstream of the cylinder is irrotational (since we have already seen that the flow pattern associated with uniform flow is irrotational--see Section 5.9), it follows from the Kelvin circulation theorem (see Section 5.6) that the velocity field remains irrotational as it is convected past the cylinder. Hence, according to Section 5.8, the stream function of the flow satisfies Laplace's equation,
 (527)

The appropriate boundary condition at the surface of the cylinder is simply that the normal fluid velocity there be zero, since the fluid must stay in contact with the cylinder, but cannot penetrate its surface. Hence, , which implies that
 (528)

since is undetermined to an arbitrary additive constant. It follows that we are searching for the most general solution of (527) that satisfies the boundary conditions (526) and (528). Comparison with Equation (522) reveals that this solution takes the form
 (529)

where
 (530)

and is the circulation of the flow around the cylinder. (Note that the velocity field can be irrotational, but still possess nonzero circulation around the cylinder, because a loop that encloses the cylinder cannot be spanned by a surface lying entirely within the fluid. Thus, zero fluid vorticity does not necessarily imply zero circulation around such a loop from Stokes' theorem.) Let us assume that , for the sake of definiteness.

Figure 28-30 show streamlines of the flow calculated for various different values of the normalized circulation, . For there exist a pair of points on the surface of the cylinder at which the flow speed is zero. These are known as stagnation points, and can be located in Figures 28 and 29 as the points at which streamlines intersect the surface of the cylinder at right-angles. Now, the tangential fluid velocity at the surface of the cylinder is

 (531)

The stagnation points correspond to the points at which (since the normal velocity is automatically zero at the surface of the cylinder). Thus, the stagnation points lie at . When the stagnation points coalesce and move off the surface of the cylinder, as illustrated in Figure 30 (the stagnation point corresponds to the point at which two streamlines cross at right-angles).

The irrotational form of Bernoulli's theorem, (467), can be combined with the boundary condition as , as well as the fact that is constant in the present case, to give

 (532)

where is the constant static fluid pressure a large distance from the cylinder. In particular, the fluid pressure on the surface of the cylinder is
 (533)

where . The net force per unit length exerted on the cylinder by the fluid has the Cartesian components
 (534) (535)

Thus, it follows from (533) that
 (536) (537)

Now, the component of the force which a moving fluid exerts on an obstacle, placed in its path, in a direction parallel to that of the unperturbed flow is usually called drag. On the other hand, the component of the force which the fluid exerts in a direction perpendicular to that of the unperturbed flow is usually called lift. Hence, the above equations imply that if a cylindrical obstacle is placed in a uniformly flowing inviscid fluid then there is zero drag. On the other hand, as long as there is net circulation of the flow around the cylinder, the lift is non-zero. Now, lift is generated because (negative) circulation tends to increase the fluid speed directly above, and to decrease it directly below, the cylinder. Thus, from Bernoulli's theorem, the fluid pressure is decreased above, and increased below, the cylinder, giving rise to a net upward force (i.e., a force in the -direction).

Suppose that the cylinder is placed in a fluid which is initially at rest, and that the fluid's uniform flow velocity, , is then very slowly ramped up (in such a manner that no vorticity is induced in the upstream flow at infinity). Since the flow pattern is initially irrotational, and since the flow pattern well upstream of the cylinder is assumed to remain irrotational, the Kelvin circulation theorem indicates that the flow pattern around the cylinder also remains irrotational. Consider the time evolution of the circulation, , around some fixed curve that lies entirely within the fluid, and encloses the cylinder. We have

 (538)

where use has been made of (454) (with assumed constant). However, in two-dimensional flow, and , where is an outward surface element of a unit depth (in the -direction) surface whose normal lies in the - plane, and that cuts the - plane at . In other words,
 (539)

We, thus, conclude that the rate of change of the circulation around is equal to minus the flux of the vorticity across [assuming that vorticity is convected by the flow, which follows from (455), the fact that , and the fact that in two-dimensional flow]. However, we have already seen that the flow field surrounding the cylinder is irrotational (i.e., such that ). It follows that is constant in time. Moreover, since originally, because the fluid surrounding the cylinder was initially at rest, we deduce that at all subsequent times. Hence, we conclude that, in an inviscid fluid, if the circulation of the flow around the cylinder is initially zero then it remains zero. It follows, from the above analysis, that, in such a fluid, zero drag force and zero lift force are exerted on the cylinder as a consequence of the fluid flow. This result is known as d'Alembert's paradox, after the French scientist Jean-Baptiste le Rond d'Alembert (1717-1783). D'Alembert's result is paradoxical because it would seem, at first sight, to be a reasonable approximation to neglect viscosity alltogether in high Reynolds number flow. However, if we do this then we end up with the nonsensical prediction that a high Reynolds number fluid is incapable of exerting any force on an obstacle placed in its path.

Next: Inviscid Flow Past a Up: Incompressible Inviscid Fluid Dynamics Previous: Two-Dimensional Irrotational Flow in
Richard Fitzpatrick 2012-04-27