Next: Dyson Series
Up: Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory
Previous: Two-State System
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Consider an atomic nucleus of spin one-half placed in a
uniform
-directed magnetic field, and then subjected to a small time-dependent magnetic field rotating in the
-
plane at the angular frequency
.
The net magnetic field is
|
(8.24) |
where
and
are constants, with
.
Assuming that
, the rotating magnetic
field represents the magnetic component of a left-hand circularly polarized
electromagnetic wave propagating along the
-axis [51]. (Obviously, if
then the wave becomes right-hand circularly polarized.)
Now, we are only interested in the effect of the wave on the nuclear spin state, so we can
neglect the wave's
electric component.
The magnetic moment of the nucleus can be written
|
(8.25) |
where
is the (dimensionless) nuclear
-factor,
the nuclear magnetron, and
the nuclear spin. (See Section 7.9.)
Hence, the effective Hamiltonian of the system becomes [49]
where
|
(8.27) |
and
|
(8.28) |
The eigenstates of the unperturbed Hamiltonian are the ``spin up'' and
``spin down'' states, denoted
and
, respectively. (In other words, the
eigenstates of
corresponding to the eigenvalues
and
, respectively.)
Thus,
|
(8.29) |
The time-dependent perturbation to the Hamiltonian can be written
|
(8.30) |
where
are the conventional raising and lowering operators
for spin angular momentum. (See Section 5.10.) It follows that
|
(8.31) |
and
|
(8.32) |
Assuming that
, it can be seen that this system is identical to the two-state system
discussed in the previous section, provided that we make the identifications
|
|
(8.33) |
|
|
(8.34) |
|
|
(8.35) |
|
|
(8.36) |
The resonant frequency,
, is simply the precession frequency
of the nuclear spin in a uniform magnetic field of strength
. (See Section 5.6.) (If
then this precession is in the same sense
as the direction of rotation of the magnetic component of a left-hand circularly polarized wave propagating along the magnetic field, and vice versa.) In the
absence of the perturbation, the expectation values of
and
oscillate because of the spin precession, but the expectation value
of
remains invariant. However, if we apply a magnetic perturbation rotating
at the resonant frequency (i.e.,
) then, according to the analysis of the previous
section, the system undergoes a succession of spin-flops,
, in addition to the spin
precession. We also know that if the rotation frequency of the
applied field is significantly different from the resonant frequency then there is
virtually zero probability of the field triggering a spin-flop. The width
of the resonance (in frequency) is determined by the strength of the
rotating magnetic perturbation. In fact, the relative width of the
resonance is
. Experimentalist are able to measure the
-factors of atomic nuclei to a
high degree of accuracy by placing them in a strong magnetic field,
and then subjecting them to a weak rotating magnetic field whose frequency is
gradually scanned.
By determining the resonant frequency (i.e., the frequency at which the
nuclei absorb energy from the rotating field), it is possible to
calculate the nuclear
-factor, and, hence, the nuclear magnetic moment [87]. In
fact,
. For a positive
-factor, the resonance occurs when
the weak magnetic field rotates in a left-handed sense (with respect to the direction of the strong magnetic field), and vice versa.
Next: Dyson Series
Up: Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory
Previous: Two-State System
Richard Fitzpatrick
2016-01-22