Particle in Infinite Square Potential Well
Consider a particle trapped in a one-dimensional square potential well, of infinite depth, which is such that
|
(4.72) |
The particle is excluded from the region or , so in this region (i.e., there
is zero probability of finding the particle outside the well). Within the well, a particle
of definite energy has a stationary wavefunction, , that satisfies
|
(4.73) |
[See Equation (4.71).]
The boundary conditions are
|
(4.74) |
This follows because in the region or , and must be continuous [because a discontinuous
wavefunction would generate a singular term (i.e., the term involving
) in the time-independent Schrödinger equation, (4.71),
that could not be balanced, even by an infinite potential].
Let us search for solutions to Equation (4.73) of the form
|
(4.75) |
where is a constant. It follows that
|
(4.76) |
The solution (4.75) automatically satisfies the boundary condition . The second boundary
condition, , leads to a quantization of the wavenumber; that is,
|
(4.77) |
where
et cetera. (A “quantized” quantity is one that can only take certain discrete values.) According to Equation (4.76), the energy is also quantized.
In fact, , where
|
(4.78) |
Thus, the allowed wavefunctions for a particle trapped in a one-dimensional square potential well of infinite depth are
|
(4.79) |
where is a positive integer, and a constant. We cannot have , because, in this case, we obtain
a null wavefunction—that is, , everywhere—which corresponds to a non-existent state. Furthermore, if takes a negative integer value
then it generates exactly the same wavefunction as the corresponding positive integer value (assuming
).
The constant , appearing in the previous wavefunction, can be determined from the constraint that the
wavefunction be properly normalized. For the case under consideration, the normalization condition (4.27)
reduces to
|
(4.80) |
It follows from Equation (4.79) that
. Hence, the properly normalized version of the wavefunction (4.79)
is
|
(4.81) |
Figure 4.4 shows the first four properly normalized stationary wavefunctions for a particle trapped in a one-dimensional
square potential well of infinite depth; that is,
,
for to .
Figure 4.4:
First four stationary wavefunctions for a particle trapped in a one-dimensional
square potential well of infinite depth.
|
At first sight, it seems rather strange that the lowest possible energy for a particle trapped in a one-dimensional
potential well is not zero, as would be the case in classical mechanics, but rather
. In fact,
as explained in the following, this residual energy is a direct consequence of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. A
particle trapped in a one-dimensional well of width is likely to be found
anywhere inside the well. Thus, the uncertainty in the particle's position is
. It
follows from the uncertainty principle, (4.65), that
|
(4.82) |
In other words, the particle cannot have zero momentum. In fact, the particle's momentum
must be at least
.
However, for a free particle,
. Hence, the residual energy associated with the
particle's residual momentum is
|
(4.83) |
This type of residual energy, which often occurs in quantum mechanical systems, and has no equivalent in classical
mechanics, is called zero-point energy.
The most general wavefunction for a particle trapped in a one-dimensional square potential well, of infinite depth,
is a superposition of all of the possible stationary states. That is,
|
(4.84) |
where the are complex numbers, and the
are specified in Equation (4.81).
Consider
However,
|
(4.86) |
where
, which is known as a Kronecker delta, takes the value 1 if , and 0 otherwise.
Hence, we deduce that
|
(4.87) |
Thus, the wavefunction (4.84) is properly normalized provided
|
(4.88) |
Suppose that we make a measurement of the energy of a particle whose wavefunction is specified by Equation (4.84). Given that the wavefunction is a superposition of stationary states associated
with the quantized energies [see Equation (4.78)], it seems reasonable to assume that the
measurement will result in one of these energies. In fact, according to quantum mechanics, the
probability that a measurement of the particle's energy will give the result is . Thus, we
can see that the normalization condition (4.88) ensures that the sum of all of these probabilities
is unity. This must be the case, because a measurement of the particle's energy is certain to give one of the
allowed energies. Suppose that we make a measurement of the particle's energy, and obtain the result .
A second measurement, made immediately after the first, must yield the same result. In other words, immediately
after the first measurement, the particle's wavefunction must be such that a measurement of its energy
is certain to give the result , and has no chance of giving the result , where . This
implies that
and , where . We conclude that, after the first
measurement, the particle's wavefunction is
. This is another example of the collapse of a wavefunction consequent on a measurement. (See Section 4.2.8.)