next up previous contents
Next: Spin precession Up: Spin angular momentum Previous: Eigenstates of and   Contents


The Pauli representation

Let us denote the two independent spin eigenstates of an electron as
\begin{displaymath}
\chi_\pm \equiv \chi_{1/2,\pm 1/2}.
\end{displaymath} (713)

It thus follows, from Eqs. (696) and (697), that
$\displaystyle S_z\,\chi_\pm$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle \pm \frac{1}{2}\,\hbar\,\chi_\pm,$ (714)
$\displaystyle S^2\,\chi_\pm$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle \frac{3}{4}\,\hbar^2\,\chi_\pm.$ (715)

Note that $\chi_+$ corresponds to an electron whose spin angular momentum vector has a positive component along the $z$-axis. Loosely speaking, we could say that the spin vector points in the $+z$-direction (or its spin is ``up''). Likewise, $\chi_-$ corresponds to an electron whose spin points in the $-z$-direction (or whose spin is ``down''). These two eigenstates satisfy the orthonormality requirements
\begin{displaymath}
\chi_+^\dag\,\chi_+ = \chi_-^\dag\,\chi_- = 1,
\end{displaymath} (716)

and
\begin{displaymath}
\chi_+^\dag\,\chi_- = 0.
\end{displaymath} (717)

A general spin state can be represented as a linear combination of $\chi_+$ and $\chi_-$: i.e.,
\begin{displaymath}
\chi = c_+\,\chi_+ + c_-\,\chi_-.
\end{displaymath} (718)

It is thus evident that electron spin space is two-dimensional.

Up to now, we have discussed spin space in rather abstract terms. In the following, we shall describe a particular representation of electron spin space due to Pauli. This so-called Pauli representation allows us to visualize spin space, and also facilitates calculations involving spin.

Let us attempt to represent a general spin state as a complex column vector in some two-dimensional space: i.e.,

\begin{displaymath}
\chi \equiv \left(\begin{array}{c}c_+\\ c_-\end{array}\right).
\end{displaymath} (719)

The corresponding dual vector is represented as a row vector: i.e.,
\begin{displaymath}
\chi^\dag\equiv (c_+^\ast, c_-^\ast).
\end{displaymath} (720)

Furthermore, the product $\chi^\dag\,\chi$ is obtained according to the ordinary rules of matrix multiplication: i.e.,
\begin{displaymath}
\chi^\dag\,\chi = (c_+^\ast, c_-^\ast)\left(\begin{array}{c}...
...+ + c_-^\ast\,c_- = \vert c_+\vert^2 + \vert c_-\vert^2\geq 0.
\end{displaymath} (721)

Likewise, the product $\chi^\dag\,\chi'$ of two different spin states is also obtained from the rules of matrix multiplication: i.e.,
\begin{displaymath}
\chi^\dag\,\chi' = (c_+^\ast, c_-^\ast)\left(\begin{array}{c}c_+'\\ c_-'\end{array}\right) = c_+^\ast\,c_+' + c_-^\ast\,c_-'.
\end{displaymath} (722)

Note that this particular representation of spin space is in complete accordance with the discussion in Sect. 10.3. For obvious reasons, a vector used to represent a spin state is generally known as spinor.

A general spin operator $A$ is represented as a $2\times 2$ matrix which operates on a spinor: i.e.,

\begin{displaymath}
A\,\chi \equiv \left(\begin{array}{cc}A_{11},& A_{12}\\
A_{...
...rray}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c}c_+\\ c_-\end{array}\right).
\end{displaymath} (723)

As is easily demonstrated, the hermitian conjugate of $A$ is represented by the transposed complex conjugate of the matrix used to represent $A$: i.e.,
\begin{displaymath}
A^\dag\equiv \left(\begin{array}{cc}A_{11}^\ast,& A_{21}^\ast\\
A_{12}^\ast,& A_{22}^\ast\end{array}\right).
\end{displaymath} (724)

Let us represent the spin eigenstates $\chi_+$ and $\chi_-$ as

\begin{displaymath}
\chi_+ \equiv \left(\begin{array}{c}1\\ 0\end{array}\right),
\end{displaymath} (725)

and
\begin{displaymath}
\chi_- \equiv \left(\begin{array}{c}0\\ 1\end{array}\right),
\end{displaymath} (726)

respectively. Note that these forms automatically satisfy the orthonormality constraints (716) and (717). It is convenient to write the spin operators $S_i$ (where $i=1,2,3$ corresponds to $x,y,z$) as
\begin{displaymath}
S_i = \frac{\hbar}{2}\,\sigma_i.
\end{displaymath} (727)

Here, the $\sigma_i$ are dimensionless $2\times 2$ matrices. According to Eqs. (681)-(683), the $\sigma_i$ satisfy the commutation relations
$\displaystyle [\sigma_x, \sigma_y]$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle 2\,{\rm i}\,\sigma_z,$ (728)
$\displaystyle [\sigma_y, \sigma_z]$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle 2\,{\rm i}\,\sigma_x,$ (729)
$\displaystyle [\sigma_z,\sigma_x]$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle 2\,{\rm i}\,\sigma_y.$ (730)

Furthermore, Eq. (714) yields
\begin{displaymath}
\sigma_z\,\chi_\pm = \pm \chi_\pm.
\end{displaymath} (731)

It is easily demonstrated, from the above expressions, that the $\sigma_i$ are represented by the following matrices:
$\displaystyle \sigma_x$ $\textstyle \equiv$ $\displaystyle \left(\begin{array}{cc}0,&1\\
1,& 0\end{array}\right),$ (732)
$\displaystyle \sigma_y$ $\textstyle \equiv$ $\displaystyle \left(\begin{array}{cc}0,&-{\rm i}\\
{\rm i},& 0\end{array}\right),$ (733)
$\displaystyle \sigma_z$ $\textstyle \equiv$ $\displaystyle \left(\begin{array}{cc}1,&0\\
0,& -1\end{array}\right).$ (734)

Incidentally, these matrices are generally known as the Pauli matrices.

Finally, a general spinor takes the form

\begin{displaymath}
\chi = c_+\,\chi_++c_-\,\chi_- = \left(\begin{array}{c}c_+\\ c_-\end{array}\right).
\end{displaymath} (735)

If the spinor is properly normalized then
\begin{displaymath}
\chi^\dag\,\chi = \vert c_+\vert^2 + \vert c_-\vert^2 =1.
\end{displaymath} (736)

In this case, we can interpret $\vert c_+\vert^2$ as the probability that an observation of $S_z$ will yield the result $+\hbar/2$, and $\vert c_-\vert^2$ as the probability that an observation of $S_z$ will yield the result $-\hbar/2$.


next up previous contents
Next: Spin precession Up: Spin angular momentum Previous: Eigenstates of and   Contents
Richard Fitzpatrick 2006-12-12