Alpha Decay
Many types of heavy atomic nuclei spontaneously decay to produce daughter nuclei
via the emission of
-particles (i.e., helium nuclei) of some characteristic energy.
This process is known as
-decay. Let us investigate the
-decay of a particular type of atomic nucleus of radius
, charge-number
,
and mass-number
. Such a nucleus thus decays to produce a daughter
nucleus of charge-number
and mass-number
,
and an
-particle of charge-number
and mass-number
. Let the characteristic energy of the
-particle
be
. Incidentally, nuclear radii
are found to satisfy the empirical formula
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66732/66732014135913619af7bebbbaf3e37acb20b82a" alt="$\displaystyle R = 1.5\times 10^{-15}\,A^{1/3}\,{\rm m}=2.0\times 10^{-15}\,Z_1^{\,1/3}\,{\rm m}$" |
(4.146) |
for
.
In 1928, George Gamov proposed a very successful theory of
-decay,
according to which the
-particle moves freely inside the nucleus, and is emitted after tunneling through the
potential barrier between itself and the daughter nucleus. In other words,
the
-particle, whose energy is
, is trapped in a potential well of radius
by the
potential barrier
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78f5b/78f5b4cf4a51c36706349446e06432dc1dacc867" alt="$\displaystyle U(r) = \frac{Z_1\,Z_2\,e^{2}}{4\pi\,\epsilon_0\,r}$" |
(4.147) |
for
. (See Section 2.1.4.) Here,
is the magnitude of the electron charge.
Making use of the WKB approximation (and neglecting the fact
that
is a radial, rather than a Cartesian, coordinate), the probability
of the
-particle tunneling through the barrier is
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f176/1f176fc4d447a9ea1cff78f090fb1cd4ed02f3af" alt="$\displaystyle \vert T\vert^{2} = \exp\left(-\frac{2\!\sqrt{2\,m}}{\hbar}\int_{r_1}^{r_2}
\!\sqrt{U(r)-E}\,dr\right),$" |
(4.148) |
where
and
. Here,
is the
-particle mass, and
is the proton mass. The previous expression
reduces to
![$\displaystyle \vert T\vert^{2} = \exp\left[-2\!\sqrt{2}\,\beta \int_{1}^{E_c/E}\left(\frac{1}{y}-\frac{E}{E_c}\right)^{1/2} dy\right],$](img3225.png) |
(4.149) |
where
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9648/c964868c9b6c1ee661ba568d0881b1da40bafc56" alt="$\displaystyle \beta = \left(\frac{Z_1\,Z_2\,e^{2}\,m\,R}{4\pi\,\epsilon_0\,\hbar^{2}}\right)^{1/2} = 0.74\,Z_1^{\,2/3}$" |
(4.150) |
is a dimensionless constant, and
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4649/a4649c16e7dfb1c3d5669f3c259feacf55024445" alt="$\displaystyle E_c = \frac{Z_1\,Z_2\,e^{2}}{4\pi\,\epsilon_0\,R} = 1.44\,Z_1^{\,2/3}\,\,{\rm MeV}$" |
(4.151) |
is the characteristic energy the
-particle would need in order to escape
from the nucleus without tunneling. Of course,
.
It is easily demonstrated that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02a63/02a63fb6d3e6a67540efbf630ef55ee79f6678e0" alt="$\displaystyle \int_1^{1/\epsilon}\left(\frac{1}{y} - \epsilon\right)^{1/2} dy \simeq
\frac{\pi}{2\!\sqrt{\epsilon}}-2$" |
(4.152) |
when
.
Hence.
![$\displaystyle \vert T\vert^{2} \simeq \exp\left[-2\!\sqrt{2}\,\beta\left(\frac{\pi}{2}\!\sqrt{\frac{E_c}{E}}-2\right)\right].$](img3231.png) |
(4.153) |
Now, the
-particle moves inside the nucleus at the characteristic
velocity
. It follows that the particle bounces backward
and forward within the nucleus at the frequency
, giving
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44fb8/44fb8024b8d3530519825ddd7ce35adbe5ea9c31" alt="$\displaystyle \nu\simeq 2\times 10^{28}\,\,{\rm yr}^{-1}$" |
(4.154) |
for a 1 MeV
-particle trapped inside a typical heavy nucleus of radius
m.
Thus, the
-particle effectively attempts to tunnel through the potential
barrier
times a second. If each of these attempts has a probability
of succeeding then the probability of decay per unit time
is
. Hence, if there are
intact nuclei at time
then
there are only
at time
, where
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/419d0/419d0879e63ba59768eafbae37a6fba030d28f77" alt="$\displaystyle dN = - N\,\nu\,\vert T\vert^{2}\,dt.$" |
(4.155) |
This expression can be integrated to give
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7f21/c7f2164bcdac9b294f9c46bdf071e48a47df3bc0" alt="$\displaystyle N(t) = N(0)\,\exp\left(-\nu\,\vert T\vert^{2}\,t\right).$" |
(4.156) |
The half-life,
, is defined as the time which must elapse
in order for half of the nuclei originally present to decay. It follows from
the previous formula that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8b0e/b8b0ed90e03c0840726f58b85b5923a6956c6083" alt="$\displaystyle \tau = \frac{\ln 2}{\nu\,\vert T\vert^{2}}.$" |
(4.157) |
Note that the half-life is independent of
.
Finally, making use of the previous results, we obtain
![$\displaystyle \log_{10}[\tau ({\rm yr})] = -C_1 - C_2\,Z_1^{\,2/3} + C_3\,\frac{Z_1}{\sqrt{E({\rm MeV})}},$](img3245.png) |
(4.158) |
where
Figure: 4.12
The experimentally determined half-life,
, of various atomic nuclei that decay via
-emission versus the best-fit theoretical half-life
. Both half-lives are measured in years. Here,
, where
is the charge-number of the nucleus, and
the characteristic energy of the emitted
-particle in MeV. In
order of increasing half-life, the points correspond to the
following nuclei: Rn 215, Po 214, Po 216, Po 197, Fm 250, Ac 225, U 230, U 232, U 234, Gd 150, U 236, U 238, Pt 190, Gd 152, Nd 144. (Data obtained from International Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Data Center.)
|
The half-life,
, the daughter charge-number,
, and
the
-particle energy,
, for atomic nuclei that undergo
-decay
are indeed found to satisfy a relationship of the form (4.158). See Figure 4.12. The
best fit to the data shown in the figure is obtained using
It can be seen that these values are remarkably similar to those calculated previously.