Next: The two-state system
Up: Time-independent perturbation theory
Previous: Introduction
Contents
Before commencing our investigation, it is helpful to introduce some
improved notation. Let the
be a complete set of eigenstates
of the Hamiltonian,
, corresponding to the eigenvalues
:
i.e.,
 |
(834) |
Now, we expect the
to be orthonormal (see Sect. 4.9).
In one dimension, this implies that
 |
(835) |
In three dimensions (see Sect. 7), the above expression generalizes to
 |
(836) |
Finally, if the
are spinors (see Sect. 10) then
we have
 |
(837) |
The generalization to the case where
is a product of a regular
wave-function and a spinor is fairly obvious. We can represent all
of the above possibilities by writing
 |
(838) |
Here, the term in angle brackets represents the integrals in Eqs. (835)
and (836) in one- and three-dimensional regular space, respectively,
and the spinor product (837) in spin-space. The advantage of
our new notation is its great generality: i.e., it
can deal with one-dimensional wave-functions, three-dimensional wave-functions,
spinors, etc.
Expanding a general wave-function,
, in terms of the energy
eigenstates,
, we obtain
 |
(839) |
In one-dimension, the expansion coefficients take the form (see Sect. 4.9)
 |
(840) |
whereas in three-dimensions we get
 |
(841) |
Finally, if
is a spinor then we have
 |
(842) |
We can represent all of the above possibilities by
writing
 |
(843) |
The expansion (839) thus becomes
 |
(844) |
Incidentally, it follows that
 |
(845) |
Finally, if
is a general operator, and the wave-function
is expanded in the manner shown in Eq. (839), then the expectation value of
is written (see Sect. 4.9)
 |
(846) |
Here, the
are unsurprisingly known as the matrix
elements of
.
In one-dimension, the matrix elements take the form
 |
(847) |
whereas in three-dimensions we get
 |
(848) |
Finally, if
is a spinor then we have
 |
(849) |
We can represent all of the above possibilities by
writing
 |
(850) |
The expansion (846) thus becomes
 |
(851) |
Incidentally, it follows that [see Eq. (176)]
 |
(852) |
Finally, it is clear from Eq. (851) that
 |
(853) |
where the
are a complete set of eigenstates, and 1 is the
identity operator.
Next: The two-state system
Up: Time-independent perturbation theory
Previous: Introduction
Contents
Richard Fitzpatrick
2006-12-12