Next: The uncertainty principle
Up: Fundamentals of quantum mechanics
Previous: Operators
Contents
Fourier's theorerm (see Sect. 3.9), applied to wave-functions, yields
where
represents wave-number. However,
. Hence,
we can also write
where
is the momentum-space
equivalent to the real-space wave-function
.
At this stage, it is convenient to introduce a useful function called the
Dirac delta-function. This function, denoted
, was
first devised by Paul Dirac, and has the following rather
unusual properties:
is zero for
, and is infinite
at
. However, the singularity at
is such that
 |
(186) |
The delta-function is an example of what is known as a generalized function: i.e.,
its value is not well-defined at all
, but its integral is well-defined.
Consider the integral
 |
(187) |
Since
is only non-zero infinitesimally close to
, we
can safely replace
by
in the above integral (assuming
is well-behaved at
), to give
 |
(188) |
where use has been made of Eq. (186). A simple generalization of this result yields
 |
(189) |
which can also be thought of as an alternative definition of a delta-function.
Suppose that
. It follows from Eqs. (185)
and (189) that
 |
(190) |
Hence, Eq. (184) yields the important result
 |
(191) |
Similarly,
 |
(192) |
It turns out that we can just as well formulate quantum mechanics using
momentum-space wave-functions,
, as real-space wave-functions,
. The former scheme is known as the momentum representation of quantum mechanics. In the momentum representation,
wave-functions are the Fourier transforms of the equivalent real-space
wave-functions, and dynamical variables are represented by different operators. Furthermore, by analogy with Eq. (174), the
expectation value of some operator
takes the form
 |
(193) |
Consider momentum. We can write
where use has been made of Eq. (184).
However, it follows from Eq. (192)
that
 |
(195) |
Hence, using Eq. (189), we obtain
 |
(196) |
Clearly, momentum is represented by the operator
in the momentum
representation. The above expression also strongly suggests [by comparison with Eq. (140)] that
can be interpreted as
the probability density of a measurement of momentum yielding the
value
at time
. It follows that
must satisfy an analogous normalization
condition to Eq. (122): i.e.,
 |
(197) |
Consider displacement. We can write
Integration by parts yields
 |
(199) |
Hence, making use of Eqs. (192) and (189), we obtain
 |
(200) |
Clearly, displacement is represented by the operator
 |
(201) |
in the momentum representation.
Finally, let us consider the normalization of the momentum-space wave-function
. We have
 |
(202) |
Thus, it follows from Eqs. (192) and (189)
that
 |
(203) |
Hence, if
is properly normalized [see Eq. (122)] then
,
as defined in Eq. (185), is also properly normalized [see Eq. (197)].
The existence of the momentum representation illustrates an important point:
i.e., that there are many different, but entirely equivalent, ways
of mathematically formulating quantum mechanics. For instance, it
is also possible to represent wave-functions as row and column vectors, and dynamical
variables
as matrices which act upon these vectors.
Next: The uncertainty principle
Up: Fundamentals of quantum mechanics
Previous: Operators
Contents
Richard Fitzpatrick
2006-12-12