Elliptic orbits
Let us determine
the radial and angular coordinates,
and
, respectively, of
a planet in an elliptical orbit about the Sun as a function of time.
Suppose that the planet
passes through its perihelion point,
and
, at
.
The constant
is termed the time of perihelion passage. It
follows from the previous analysis that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2aaf/a2aaf31c20db68f43f38f88f63e5898f28b5a0c0" alt="$\displaystyle r = \frac{r_p\,(1+e)}{1+e\,\cos\theta},$" |
(4.51) |
and
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e043/0e04335b7e56d04f1067a642db3de52f4263667a" alt="$\displaystyle {\cal E} = \frac{\skew{3}\dot{r}^{\,2}}{2} + \frac{h^{\,2}}{2\,r^{\,2}} - \frac{G\,M}{r},$" |
(4.52) |
where
,
, and
are the orbital eccentricity, angular momentum per unit mass, and
energy per unit mass, respectively. The preceding equation can be rearranged to
give
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36aa8/36aa8150b0fd8618b27b4278f11c249e0ec01270" alt="$\displaystyle \skew{3}\dot{r}^{\,2} = (e-1)\,\frac{G\,M}{r_p} - (e+1)\,\frac{r_p\,G\,M}{r^{\,2}}
+ \frac{2\,G\,M}{r}.$" |
(4.53) |
Taking the square root, and integrating, we obtain
![$\displaystyle \int_{r_p}^r\frac{r\,dr}{[2\,r + (e-1)\,r^{\,2}/r_p - (e+1)\,r_p]^{1/2}} =
\sqrt{G\,M}\,\,(t-\tau).$](img680.png) |
(4.54) |
Consider an elliptical orbit characterized by
. Let us write
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6fe6/d6fe68e233756f96f6bc31f4311e32376d46f0f6" alt="$\displaystyle r = \frac{r_p}{1-e}\,(1-e\,\cos E),$" |
(4.55) |
where
is termed the eccentric anomaly. In fact,
is an angle that
varies between
and
. Moreover, the perihelion point corresponds to
, and the aphelion point to
. Now,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75aa0/75aa07e7d8923622ad27edfbbaffee9513e0c376" alt="$\displaystyle dr = \frac{r_p}{1-e}\,e\,\sin E\,dE,$" |
(4.56) |
whereas
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4873/c4873283886f6248edb28523fd7458c804bcbbb4" alt="$\displaystyle 2\,r + (e-1)\,\frac{r^{\,2}}{r_p}- (e+1)\,r_p = \frac{r_p}{1-e}\,e^{\,2}\,(1-\cos^2 E)= \frac{r_p}{1-e}\,e^{\,2}\,\sin^2E.$" |
(4.57) |
Thus, Equation (4.54) reduces to
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/492b8/492b8276e30002a0d25005f22268982ac9df118e" alt="$\displaystyle \int_0^E (1-e\,\cos E)\,dE = \left(\frac{G\,M}{a^{\,3}}\right)^{1/2} (t-\tau),$" |
(4.58) |
where
. This equation can immediately be integrated to give
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac945/ac9459cbcbd25747ab9f091842947c7aab76dfef" alt="$\displaystyle E - e\,\sin E = {\cal M}.$" |
(4.59) |
Here,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db413/db41380492ef7cc23f16af344865679c95342256" alt="$\displaystyle {\cal M} = n\,(t-\tau)$" |
(4.60) |
is termed the mean anomaly,
is the mean orbital angular velocity, and
the orbital period. The mean anomaly is an angle that increases
uniformly in time at the rate of
radians every orbital period.
Moreover, the perihelion point corresponds to
, and the aphelion point to
. Incidentally, the angle
, which determines the true angular location of the planet relative to its perihelion point, is called the
true anomaly.
Equation (4.59),
which is known as Kepler's equation, is a transcendental equation
that does not possess a convenient analytic solution. Fortunately, it is fairly straightforward to
solve numerically. For instance, when we use an iterative approach,
if
is the
th guess then
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4199/f4199d83ae6bcca182011354737c79d4e381c9de" alt="$\displaystyle E_{n+1} = {\cal M}+ e\,\sin E_n;$" |
(4.61) |
this iteration scheme converges very rapidly when
(as is the case for planetary orbits).
Figure 4.5:
Eccentric anomaly.
|
Equations (4.51) and (4.55) can be combined to give
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51417/514176c1a0a8e8023a9303b0f959631620c35d01" alt="$\displaystyle r\,\cos\theta = a\,(\cos E-e).$" |
(4.62) |
This expression allows us to give a simple geometric interpretation of the eccentric anomaly,
.
Consider Figure 4.5. Let
represent the elliptical orbit of a planet,
, about the Sun,
.
Let
be the major axis of the orbit, where
is the perihelion point,
the aphelion point, and
the geometric center. It follows that
and
(see Section A.9), where
is the orbital major radius and
the
eccentricity. Moreover, the distance
and the angle
correspond to the radial distance,
, and the
true anomaly,
, respectively. Let
be a circle of radius
centered on
. It follows that
is
a diameter of this circle. Let
be a line, perpendicular to
, that passes through
and joins the
circle to the diameter. It follows that
. Let us denote the angle
as
. Simple trigonometry
reveals that
and
. But,
, or
, which can be
rearranged to give
, which is identical to Equation (4.62). We, thus, conclude that the
eccentric anomaly,
, can be identified with the angle
in Figure 4.5.
Equations (4.51) and (4.55) can be combined
to give
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23b2f/23b2f431a0cd3a543eae32b32c16a99e543e811e" alt="$\displaystyle \cos\theta = \frac{\cos E - e}{1-e\,\cos E}.$" |
(4.63) |
Thus,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a6aa/7a6aafcb6160043b6fa10593bf57b58ee8a65403" alt="$\displaystyle 1+\cos\theta = 2\,\cos^2(\theta/2) = \frac{2\,(1-e)\,\cos^2( E/2)}{1-e\,\cos E},$" |
(4.64) |
and
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b331/1b3316fa3da0338df5818bc76266cdc203993b9b" alt="$\displaystyle 1-\cos\theta = 2\,\sin^2(\theta/2) = \frac{2\,(1+e)\,\sin^2 (E/2)}{1-e\,\cos E}.$" |
(4.65) |
The previous two equations imply that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7682e/7682ef90fc2c78eafc9edba07a2f657f48ca6edb" alt="$\displaystyle \tan (\theta/2) = \left(\frac{1+e}{1-e}\right)^{1/2}\tan (E/2).$" |
(4.66) |
The eccentric anomaly,
, and the true anomaly,
, always lie in the same quadrant (i.e., if
then
, etc.)
We conclude that, in the case of a planet in an elliptical orbit around the Sun, the radial distance,
, and the
true anomaly,
, are specified as functions of time via the solution of the following set of equations:
Here,
,
, and
. Incidentally, it is clear that if
then
,
, and
. In other words, the motion is periodic with period
.