Constant-
Limit
Let us suppose that there are two layers in
space. In the small-
layer, suppose that Equation (5.78) reduces to
![$\displaystyle \frac{d}{dp}\!\left[\frac{p^2}{-{\rm i}\,(Q-Q_E-Q_e) + p^2}\,\frac{dY_e}{dp}\right]\simeq 0$](img2161.png) |
(5.84) |
when
. Integrating directly, we find that
![$\displaystyle Y_e(p) \simeq Y_0 \left\{\frac{\skew{6}\hat{\mit\Delta}}{\pi}\lef...
... + \frac{p}{{\rm i}\,(Q-Q_E-Q_e)}\right] + 1 + {\cal O}\left(p^2\right)\right\}$](img2163.png) |
(5.85) |
for
, where use has been made of Equation (5.83). The two-layer approximation is
equivalent to the well-known constant-
approximation [17].
In the large-
layer, for
, we obtain
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e911a/e911a99014c897818325ea750315cf647d346eab" alt="$\displaystyle \frac{d^2 Y_e}{dp^2} - \frac{B(p)}{C(p)}\,p^2\,Y_e\simeq 0,$" |
(5.86) |
with
bounded as
. Asymptotic matching to the small-
layer solution (5.85) yields the boundary
condition
![$\displaystyle Y_e(p)\simeq Y_0\left[1+ \frac{\skew{6}\hat{\mit\Delta}}{\pi}\,\frac{p}{{\rm i}\,(Q-Q_E-Q_e)}+ {\cal O}\left(p^2\right)\right]$](img2167.png) |
(5.87) |
as
.
In the various constant-
linear response regimes considered in Section 5.9, Equation (5.86) reduces to an
equation of the form
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c37a6/c37a621fe3156e0919e26d0d01d24068ee74742b" alt="$\displaystyle \frac{d^2Y_e}{dp^2}- G\,p^k\,Y_e\simeq 0,$" |
(5.88) |
where
is real and non-negative, and
is a complex constant. Let
and
, where
. The previous equation transforms into a modified Bessel equation of general order,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2476/e24762bdd910f467601adba508009fbeb2cca887" alt="$\displaystyle q^2\,\frac{d^2Z}{dq^2} + q\,\frac{dZ}{dq} - (q^2+\nu^2)\,Z =0,$" |
(5.89) |
where
. The solution that is bounded as
has the small-
expansion [1]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b756/4b7566f6db81b1a00db633c05c9b7bcdc2b83b36" alt="$\displaystyle K_\nu(z)= \frac{1}{{\mit\Gamma}(1-\nu)}\left(\frac{2}{q}\right)^\...
...it\Gamma}(1+\nu)}\left(\frac{q}{2}\right)^\nu + {\cal O}\left(q^{2-\nu}\right),$" |
(5.90) |
where
is a gamma function.
A comparison of this expression with Equation (5.87) reveals that
![$\displaystyle \skew{6}\hat{\mit\Delta} = \frac{\nu^{2\nu-1}\,\pi\,{\mit\Gamma}(...
...u)}{{\mit\Gamma}(\nu)}\left[-{\rm i}\,\left(Q-Q_E-\,Q_e\right)\right]G^{\,\nu}.$](img2180.png) |
(5.91) |
Note, finally, that
, where
denotes the width of the large-
layer in
space. This width must be larger than
(i.e., the width of the small-
layer) in order for the constant-
approximation to hold. Finally, it is easily demonstrated that the neglect of the term involving
in Equation (5.74) is
justified provided that
.