   Next: Wake Downstream of a Up: Incompressible Boundary Layers Previous: Self-Similar Boundary Layers

# Boundary Layer on a Flat Plate

Consider a flat plate of length , infinite width, and negligible thickness, that lies in the - plane, and whose two edges correspond to and . Suppose that the plate is immersed in a low viscosity fluid whose unperturbed velocity field is . (See Figure 8.4.) In the inviscid limit, the appropriate boundary condition at the surface of the plate, --corresponding to the requirement of zero normal velocity--is already satisfied by the unperturbed flow. Hence, the original flow is not modified by the presence of the plate. However, when we take the finite viscosity of the fluid into account, an additional boundary condition, --corresponding to the no slip condition--must be satisfied at the plate. The imposition of this additional constraint causes thin boundary layers, of thickness , to form above and below the plate. The fluid flow outside the boundary layers remains effectively inviscid, whereas that inside the layers is modified by viscosity. It follows that the flow external to the layers is unaffected by the presence of the plate. Hence, the tangential velocity at the outer edge of the boundary layers is . This corresponds to the case discussed in the previous section. [See Equation (8.52).] (Here, we are assuming that the flow upstream of the trailing edge of the plate, , is unaffected by the edge's presence, and, is, therefore, the same as if the plate were of infinite length. Of course, the flow downstream of the edge is modified as a consequence of the finite length of the plate.) Making use of the analysis contained in the previous section (with ), as well as the fact that, by symmetry, the lower boundary layer is the mirror image of the upper one, the tangential velocity profile across the both layers is written (8.64)

where (8.65)

Here, is the solution of (8.66)

that satisfies the boundary conditions (8.67)

and  (8.68)  (8.69)

Equation (8.66) is known as the Blasius equation. It is convenient to define the so-called displacement thickness of the upper boundary layer, (8.70)

which can be interpreted as the distance through which streamlines just outside the layer are displaced laterally due to the retardation of the flow within the layer. (Of course, the thickness of the lower boundary layer is the same as that of the upper layer.) It follows that (8.71)

In fact, the numerical solution of Equation (8.66), subject to the boundary conditions (8.67)-(8.69), yields (8.72)

Hence, the thickness of the boundary layer increases as the square root of the distance from the leading edge of the plate. In particular, the thickness at the trailing edge of the plate is (8.73)

where (8.74)

is the appropriate Reynolds number for the interaction of the flow with the plate. Note that if then the thickness of the boundary layer is much less than its length, as was previously assumed.

The tangential velocity profile across the both boundary layers, which takes the form (8.75)

is plotted in Figure 8.5. In addition, the vorticity profile across the layers, which is written (8.76)

is shown in Figure 8.6. The vorticity is negative in the upper boundary layer (i.e., ), positive in the lower boundary layer (i.e., ), and discontinuous across the plate (which is located at ). Finally, the net viscous drag force per unit width (along the -axis) acting on the plate in the -direction is (8.77)

where the factor of is needed to take into account the presence of boundary layers both above and below the plate. It follows from Equation (8.59) (with ) that (8.78)

In fact, the numerical solution of (8.66) yields (8.79) The previous discussion is premised on the assumption that the flow in the upper (or lower) boundary layer is both steady and -independent. It turns out that this assumption becomes invalid when the Reynolds number of the layer, , exceeds a critical value which is about (Batchelor 2000). In this case, small-scale -dependent disturbances spontaneously grow to large amplitude, and the layer becomes turbulent. Because , if the criterion for boundary layer turbulence is not satisfied at the trailing edge of the plate, , then it is not satisfied anywhere else in the layer. Thus, the previous analysis, which neglects turbulence, remains valid provided . According to Equation (8.73), this implies that the analysis is valid when , where is the Reynolds number of the external flow. Consider, finally, the situation illustrated in Figure 8.7 in which an initially irrotational fluid passes between two flat parallel plates. Let be the perpendicular distance between the plates. As we have seen, the finite viscosity of the fluid causes boundary layers to form on the inner surfaces of the upper and lower plates. The flow within these layers possesses non-zero vorticity, and is significantly affected by viscosity. On the other hand, the flow outside the layers is irrotational and essentially inviscid--this type of flow is usually termed potential flow (because it can be derived from a velocity potential satisfying Laplace's equation). The thickness of the two boundary layers increases like , where represents distance, parallel to the flow, measured from the leading edges of the plates. It follows that, as increases, the region of potential flow shrinks in size, and eventually disappears. (See Figure 8.7.) Assuming that, prior to merging, the two boundary layers do not significantly affect one another, their thickness, , is given by formula (8.72), where is the speed of the incident fluid. The region of potential flow thus extends from (which corresponds to the leading edge of the plates) to , where (8.80)

It follows that (8.81)

where (8.82)

Thus, when an irrotational high Reynolds number fluid passes between two parallel plates then the region of potential flow extends a comparatively long distance between the plates, relative to their spacing (i.e., ). By analogy, if an irrotational high Reynolds number fluid passes into a pipe then the fluid remains essentially irrotational until it has travelled a considerable distance along the pipe, compared to its diameter. Obviously, these conclusions are modified if the flow becomes turbulent.   Next: Wake Downstream of a Up: Incompressible Boundary Layers Previous: Self-Similar Boundary Layers
Richard Fitzpatrick 2016-03-31