Next: Free Electron Motion
Up: Relativistic Electron Theory
Previous: Dirac Equation
Consider two inertial frames,
and
. Let the
and
be the space-time coordinates of a given event in each frame, respectively.
These coordinates are related via a Lorentz transformation, which takes the general form
|
(11.52) |
where the
are real numerical coefficients that are independent of the
.
We also have
|
(11.53) |
Now, because [see Equation (11.5)]
|
(11.54) |
it follows that
|
(11.55) |
Moreover, it is easily shown that
By definition, a 4-vector,
, has analogous transformation properties to the
. Thus,
et cetera.
In frame
, the Dirac equation is written
|
(11.60) |
Let
be the wavefunction in frame
. Suppose that
|
(11.61) |
where
is a
transformation matrix that is independent of the
. (Hence,
commutes with the
and the
.)
Multiplying Equation (11.60) by
, we obtain
|
(11.62) |
Hence, given that the
and
are the covariant components of 4-vectors, we obtain
|
(11.63) |
Suppose that
|
(11.64) |
which is equivalent to
|
(11.65) |
Here, we have assumed that the
commute with
and the
(because they are just numbers). If Equation (11.64)
holds then Equation (11.63) becomes
|
(11.66) |
A comparison of this equation with Equation (11.60) reveals that the Dirac equation takes the same form in frames
and
. In other words, the
Dirac equation is Lorentz invariant. Incidentally, it is clear from Equations (11.60) and (11.66) that the
matrices are
the same in all inertial frames.
It remains to find a transformation matrix
that satisfies Equation (11.65). Consider an infinitesimal Lorentz transformation, for which
|
(11.67) |
where the
are real numerical coefficients that are independent of the
, and are also small compared to unity. To first order in small quantities, Equation (11.55) yields
|
(11.68) |
Each of the six independent non-vanishing
generates a particular
infinitesimal Lorentz transformation. For instance,
|
(11.69) |
for a transformation to a coordinate system moving with a velocity
along the
-direction.
Furthermore,
|
(11.70) |
for a rotation through an angle
about the
-axis, and so on.
Let us write
|
(11.71) |
where the
are
matrices. To first order in small
quantities,
|
(11.72) |
Moreover, it follows from Equation (11.68) that
|
(11.73) |
To first order in small quantities, Equations (11.65), (11.67), (11.71), and (11.72) yield
|
(11.74) |
Hence, making use of the symmetry property (11.68), we obtain
|
(11.75) |
where
.
Because this equation must hold for arbitrary
, we deduce that
|
(11.76) |
Making use of the anti-commutation relations (11.29), it can be shown that a suitable solution of the previous
equation is
|
(11.77) |
(See Exercise 7.)
Hence,
Now that we have found the correct transformation rules for an infinitesimal Lorentz transformation, we can easily find those for a
finite transformation by building it up from a large number of successive infinitesimal transforms [9].
(See Exercises 8 and 9.)
Making use of Equation (11.34), as well as
, the Hermitian conjugate of Equation (11.78) can be shown
to take the form
|
(11.80) |
Hence, Equation (11.65) yields
|
(11.81) |
It follows that
|
(11.82) |
or
|
(11.83) |
which implies that
|
(11.84) |
where the
are defined in Equation (11.46). This proves that the
transform as the contravariant components
of a 4-vector.
Next: Free Electron Motion
Up: Relativistic Electron Theory
Previous: Dirac Equation
Richard Fitzpatrick
2016-01-22