Moments of Collision Operator
The most important moments of the collision operator (see Section 4.3) are the friction force density,
|
(3.163) |
acting on species- particles due to collisions with species- particles, the
friction force density,
|
(3.164) |
acting on species- particles due to collisions with species- particles,
the collisional heating rate density,
|
(3.165) |
experienced by species- particles due to collisions with species- particles, and
the collisional heating rate density,
|
(3.166) |
experienced by species- particles due to collisions with species- particles. However, as
is clear from Equations (3.35) and (3.37),
|
(3.167) |
and
|
(3.168) |
Hence, we only need to determine
and . Let us calculate these quantities using the Maxwellian collision operator (3.163).
Equations (3.163) and (3.164) imply that
where we have integrated by parts.
However, it follows from symmetry that
where is a general function. Hence, we obtain
|
(3.173) |
which yields
|
(3.174) |
where
and
. It is easily demonstrated that (Abramowitz and Stegun 1965)
Thus, we get
|
(3.177) |
Suppose that we transform to a new frame of reference that moves with velocity with respect to our original
frame. In the new reference frame,
|
(3.178) |
where use has been made of the collisional conservation law (3.31). It follows that
is invariant under Galilean
transformations. This implies that the quantity , appearing in Equation (3.178), must be reinterpreted as the relative mean flow velocity,
, between species- and species- particles.
Of course,
in our adopted reference frame in which
. It follows that the general expression for the
friction force density is
|
(3.179) |
Note that this expression satisfies the collisional momentum conservation constraint (3.168). Furthermore, it is clear that the collisional
friction force acts to reduce the relative mean flow velocity,
, of species- and species- particles.
Note that
. In other words, a plasma species cannot exert a frictional force on itself.
Equations (3.163) and (3.166) imply that
where we have integrated by parts. Making use of Equation (3.171)–(3.173), the previous expression reduces to
|
(3.181) |
which gives
|
(3.182) |
It follows from Equation (3.176) that
|
(3.183) |
Note that this expression satisfies the collisional energy conservation constraint (3.169). Furthermore, it is clear that the collisional
heating acts to reduce the temperature difference of species- and species- particles. Note that . In other words, a plasma species cannot heat itself by means of collisions.