be the number of species-
particles
per unit time, per unit flux of species-
particles incident with velocity
on a species-
particle of velocity
,
that are scattered such that
the species-
particles emerge in the velocity range
to
and the species-
particle emerges in the velocity range
to
(Reif 1965).
Assuming that the scattering process is reversible in time and space (which is certainly the
case for two-body Coulomb collisions), the
corresponding quantity for the inverse process must be equal to that for the forward process (Reif 1965). In other words,
However, it is easily demonstrated from Equations (3.12) and (3.13) that
The result
follows from the fact that the vectors
and
differ only
in direction. Hence, we deduce that
The rate of decrease in the number of species-
particles located between
and
,
and having velocities in the range
to
, due to scattering of species-
particles by species-
particles is
obtained by multiplying
by the the relative flux,
,
of species-
particles incident on a species-
particle, then multiplying by the number of species-
particles,
, that can do the scattering, and, finally, summing over all possible
species-
initial velocities, and all possible species-
and species-
final velocities.
In other words,
. Moreover,
and
are the ensemble-averaged distribution
functions for species-
and species-
particles, respectively.
In writing the previous expression, we have assumed that the distribution functions
and
are uncorrelated. This assumption is reasonable provided that the mean-free-path is much longer than the effective range of
the inter-particle force. (This follows because, before they encounter one another, two colliding particles originate at different points that are typically separated by
a mean-free-path. However, the typical correlation length is of similar magnitude to the range of the inter-particle force.)
In writing the previous expression, we have also implicitly assumed that the inter-particle force responsible for the collisions is sufficiently short-range that
the particle position vectors do not change appreciably (on a macroscopic lengthscale) during a collision. (Both of the previous
assumptions are valid in a conventional weakly coupled plasma because the range of the inter-particle force is of order the Debye
length, which is assumed to be much smaller than any macroscopic lengthscale. Moreover, the mean-free-path is much
longer than the Debye length—see Section 1.7.)
By analogy with Equation (3.19), the rate of increase in the number of species-
particles located between
and
,
and having velocities in the range
to
, due to the recoil of species-
particles that scatter species-
particles is
. Making use of Equations (3.16) and (3.17), as well as
, we obtain
The net rate of change of the distribution function of species-
particles with velocities
(at position
and time
) due to collisions with
species-
particles [i.e., the collision operator—see Equation (3.9)] is given by
![]() |
(3.22) |
,
,
, and
are short-hand for
,
,
, and
, respectively.
The previous expression is known as the Boltzmann collision operator (Boltzmann 1995).
By an analogous argument, the net rate of change of the distribution function of species-
particles with velocities
(at position
and time
) due to collisions with species-
particles is given by
Expression (3.23) for the Boltzmann collision operator can be further simplified for
elastic collisions because, in this case, the collision cross-section
is a function only of the magnitude of the relative velocity vector,
, and its change in direction as a result of the collision. Furthermore, the integral over the final velocities
and
reduces
to an integral over all solid angles for the change in direction of
. Thus,
we can write
. Here,
is the angle through which the direction of
is deflected as a consequence of the
collision (see Figure 3.1), and
is an azimuthal angle that determines the orientation of the plane in
which the vector
is confined during the collision. (See Section 3.6.) Moreover,
is a conventional
differential scattering cross-section (Reif 1965). Hence, we obtain
Note, finally, that if we exchange the identities of species-
and species-
particles in Equation (3.25) then
, but
,
, and
. Thus, we conclude that