Next: Momentum conservation
Up: Electromagnetic energy and momentum
Previous: Energy conservation
We have seen that electromagnetic waves carry energy.
It turns out that they also carry momentum. Consider the following argument, due
to Einstein. Suppose that we have a railroad car of mass and length
which is free
to move in one dimension (see Fig. 54). Suppose that electromagnetic radiation of total
energy is emitted from one end of the car, propagates along the length of
the car, and is then absorbed at the other end. The effective mass of this radiation
is (from Einstein's famous relation ). At first sight,
the process described above appears to cause the centre of mass of the system
to spontaneously shift. This violates the law of momentum conservation (assuming the
railway car is subject to no external forces). The only way in which the
centre of mass of the system can remain stationary is if the railway car
moves in the opposite direction to the direction of propagation of
the radiation. In fact, if the car moves by a distance then the centre of
mass of the system is the same before and after the radiation pulse provided that
|
(1044) |
It is assumed that in this derivation.
But, what actually causes the car to move? If the radiation possesses momentum
then the car will recoil with the same momentum as the radiation is emitted.
When the radiation hits the other end of the car then the car acquires momentum
in the opposite direction, which stops the motion. The time of flight of
the radiation is . So, the distance traveled by a mass with momentum
in this time is
|
(1045) |
giving
|
(1046) |
Thus, the momentum carried by electromagnetic radiation equals its energy divided by
the speed of light. The same result can be obtained from the well-known
relativistic formula
|
(1047) |
relating the energy , momentum , and mass of a particle. According to
quantum theory, electromagnetic radiation is made up of massless particles
called photons. Thus,
|
(1048) |
for individual photons, so the same must be true of electromagnetic radiation
as a whole. If follows from Eq. (1046)
that the momentum density of electromagnetic
radiation equals its energy density over , so
|
(1049) |
It is reasonable to suppose that the momentum points along the direction
of the energy flow (this is obviously the case for photons),
so the vector momentum density (which gives the direction,
as well as the magnitude, of the momentum per unit volume) of electromagnetic
radiation is
|
(1050) |
Thus, the momentum density equals the energy flux over .
Of course, the electric field associated with an electromagnetic wave oscillates
rapidly, which implies that the previous expressions for the energy density,
energy flux, and momentum density of electromagnetic radiation are also
rapidly oscillating. It is convenient to average over many periods of
the oscillation (this average is denoted
). Thus,
where the factor comes from averaging
. Here,
is the peak amplitude of the electric field associated with the wave.
Since electromagnetic radiation possesses momentum then it must exert a force on
bodies which absorb (or emit) radiation. Suppose that a body is placed in
a beam of perfectly collimated radiation, which it absorbs completely. The amount
of momentum absorbed per unit time, per unit cross-sectional area, is simply the
amount of momentum contained in a volume of length and unit cross-sectional
area: i.e., times the momentum density . An absorbed momentum per
unit time, per unit area, is equivalent to a pressure. In other words, the radiation
exerts a pressure on the body. Thus, the radiation pressure is given by
|
(1054) |
So, the pressure exerted by collimated electromagnetic radiation is equal to
its average energy density.
Consider a cavity filled with electromagnetic radiation. What is the radiation
pressure exerted on the walls? In this situation, the radiation propagates in
all directions with equal probability. Consider radiation propagating at an
angle to the local normal to the wall. The amount of such radiation
hitting the wall per unit time, per unit area, is proportional to .
Moreover, the component of momentum normal to the wall which the radiation
carries is also proportional to . Thus, the pressure exerted on the
wall is the same as in Eq. (1054), except that it is weighted by the
average of over all solid angles, in order to take into account
the fact
that obliquely propagating radiation exerts a pressure which is
times that of normal radiation. The average of over all solid angles
is , so for isotropic radiation
|
(1055) |
Clearly, the pressure exerted by isotropic radiation is one third of
its average energy density.
The power incident on the surface of the Earth due to radiation emitted by
the Sun is about Wm. So, what is the radiation pressure?
Since,
|
(1056) |
then
|
(1057) |
Here, the radiation is assumed to be perfectly collimated.
Thus, the radiation pressure exerted on the Earth is minuscule (one atmosphere
equals about Nm). Nevertheless, this small pressure due to
radiation is important in outer space, since it
is responsible for continuously sweeping
dust particles out of the Solar System. It is quite common for comets to exhibit
two separate tails. One (called the gas tail) consists of ionized gas, and is
swept along by the solar wind (a stream of charged particles and magnetic field-lines
emitted by the Sun). The other (called the dust tail) consists of uncharged
dust particles, and is swept radially outward from the Sun by radiation pressure.
Two separate
tails are observed if the local direction of the solar wind is not radially
outward from the Sun (which is quite often the case).
The radiation pressure from sunlight is very weak. However, that produced by
laser beams can be enormous (far higher than any conventional pressure which
has ever been produced in a laboratory). For instance, the lasers used in Inertial
Confinement Fusion (e.g., the NOVA experiment in
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)
typically have energy fluxes of Wm.
This translates to a radiation pressure of about atmospheres!
Next: Momentum conservation
Up: Electromagnetic energy and momentum
Previous: Energy conservation
Richard Fitzpatrick
2006-02-02