Rotation
Let us try to define a rotation vector
whose magnitude
is the angle of the rotation,
, and whose direction is parallel to the axis of
rotation, in the sense determined by a right-hand circulation rule. Unfortunately, this is not a good vector. The problem is that the addition of rotations
is not commutative, whereas vector addition is commuative.
Figure A.11 shows the effect of applying two successive
rotations,
one about
, and the other about the
, to a standard six-sided die. In the
left-hand case, the
-rotation is applied before the
-rotation, and vice
versa in the right-hand case. It can be seen that the die ends up in two completely
different states. In other words, the
-rotation plus the
-rotation does not equal
the
-rotation plus the
-rotation. This non-commuting algebra cannot be
represented by vectors. So, although rotations have a well-defined magnitude and
direction, they are not vector quantities.
Figure A.11:
Effect of successive rotations about perpendicular axes on a six-sided die.
|
But, this is not quite the end of the story. Suppose that we take a general vector
and rotate it about
by a small angle
.
This is equivalent to rotating the coordinate axes about the
by
.
According to Equations (A.20)–(A.22), we have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c267/3c2670e96c7160dcf6a2eab75f5aec4b08fa101a" alt="$\displaystyle {\bf a}' \simeq {\bf a} +\delta\theta_z \,{\bf e}_z\times {\bf a},$" |
(1.48) |
where use has been made of the small angle approximations
and
. The previous equation can easily be generalized to allow
small rotations about
and
by
and
,
respectively. We find that
where
Clearly, we can define a rotation vector, data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5e10/a5e100e86fa34a3e46131ac4e9243c334bf92bfe" alt="$\delta$"
, but it only
works for small angle rotations (i.e., sufficiently small that the small-angle approximations of sine and cosine are good). According to the previous equation,
a small
-rotation plus a small
-rotation is (approximately) equal to
the two rotations applied in the opposite order.
The fact that infinitesimal rotation is a vector implies that angular velocity,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ab18/8ab18666f30399df1a5ce9e26298d18f0e379d59" alt="$\displaystyle \mbox{\boldmath$\omega$}$" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e53aa/e53aac72c72e09293752fec09a90f1eadbe2a65f" alt="$\displaystyle = \lim_{\delta t\rightarrow 0} \frac{\delta
\mbox{\boldmath$\theta$} }{\delta t},$" |
(1.51) |
must be a vector as well. Also, if
is interpreted as
in Equation (A.49) then it follows that the equation of motion of a vector
that precesses about the origin with some angular velocity
is