Suppose that we observe the aforementioned clock in a frame of reference that moves with velocity with respect to the clock's rest frame, where the direction of is perpendicular to the path of the light ray in the rest frame. See Figure 3.6. Let be the time required for a light ray to travel from the clock to the reflector, and back again, in the moving frame. In the moving frame, the clock moves a parallel (to ) distance in this time interval. Note that the transverse distance, , of the reflector from the clock is the same in both reference frames. (See Section 3.2.2.) It is clear, by symmetry, that in traveling from the clock to the reflector, the light ray in the moving frame has moved a transverse distance and a parallel (to ) distance . Moreover, the ray travels the same transverse and parallel distances in traveling from the reflector back to the clock. Hence, the net path-length of the light ray is
(3.67) |
(3.68) |
(3.69) |
(3.70) |
We can also conclude that any type of clock, not just a light-clock, will tick more slowly in a moving reference frame than in its rest frame, by the same factor as our light clock, otherwise the same experiment (i.e., measuring the time it takes a light ray to travel a distance in vacuum using the former type of clock) would produced different results in different inertial frames, which is forbidden by Einstein's first postulate.
Let us define the so-called Lorentz factor,
Note that . The time dilation law, (3.71), can be written In other words, time is dilated by the Lorentz factor in a moving frame of reference.Muons are unstable particles that have measured lifetimes of in their rest frame. However, when the Earth's atmosphere is struck by cosmic-ray particles, very energetic muons that move at 98% of the speed of light are produced. The measured lifetimes of these cosmic-ray muons is indeed about five times longer than the rest-frame lifetime of a muon, in accordance with the previous two equations.