Next: Cartesian Components of a
Up: Vectors and Vector Fields
Previous: Scalars and Vectors
Suppose that the displacements
and
, shown
in Figure A.2,
represent the vectors
and
, respectively. It can be seen that the result
of combining these two displacements is to give the net displacement
. Hence,
if
represents the vector
then we can write
|
(A.1) |
This defines vector addition.
By completing the parallelogram
, we can also see that
|
(A.2) |
However,
has the same length and direction as
,
and, thus, represents the same vector,
. Likewise,
and
both represent the vector
. Thus, the previous equation is equivalent to
|
(A.3) |
We conclude that the addition of vectors is commutative. It can also
be shown that the associative law holds: that is,
|
(A.4) |
The null vector,
, is represented by a displacement of zero length and arbitrary direction.
Because the result of combining such a displacement with a finite length displacement is the same
as the latter displacement by itself, it follows that
|
(A.5) |
where
is a general vector.
The negative of
is defined as that vector which has the same magnitude, but acts in the opposite direction, and is denoted
.
The sum of
and
is thus
the null vector: that is,
|
(A.6) |
We can also define the difference of two vectors,
and
, as
|
(A.7) |
This definition of vector subtraction is illustrated in Figure A.3.
Figure A.3:
Vector subtraction.
|
If
is a scalar then the expression
denotes a vector whose direction is the same
as
, and whose magnitude
is
times that of
. (This definition becomes obvious when
is an integer.)
If
is negative then, because
, it follows
that
is a vector whose magnitude is
times that of
, and whose
direction is opposite to
. These definitions imply that if
and
are
two scalars then
Next: Cartesian Components of a
Up: Vectors and Vector Fields
Previous: Scalars and Vectors
Richard Fitzpatrick
2016-01-22