![]() |
(5.1) |
Consider the equation of motion of the th mass. See Figure 5.1. The
extensions of the springs to the immediate left and right of the mass are
and
, respectively. Thus, the
-directed
forces that these springs exert on the mass are
and
, respectively. The mass's equation of
motion therefore becomes
![]() |
We can interpret the quantities and
, that appear
in the equations of motion for
and
, respectively, as the longitudinal displacements of
the left and right extremities of springs attached to the outermost masses in such a manner as to form the left and right boundaries of the array.
The respective equilibrium positions of these extremities are
and
.
The end displacements,
and
, must be prescribed, otherwise Equations (5.2)
do not constitute a complete set of equations. In other words, there are more unknowns than equations.
The particular choice of
and
depends on the nature of the physical
boundary conditions at the two ends of the array. Suppose that the
left extremity of the leftmost spring is anchored in an
immovable wall. This implies that
; that is, the left extremity of the
spring cannot move. Suppose, on the other hand, that the left extremity of the leftmost spring is not attached to anything. In this case, there is no reason for the spring
to become extended, which implies that
. In other words, if the left
end of the array is fixed (i.e., attached to an immovable object) then
, and if the left end is
free (i.e., not attached to anything) then
. Likewise, if the right end of the array
is fixed then
, and if the right end is free then
.
Suppose, for the sake of argument, that the left end of the array is
free, and the right end is fixed. It follows that
, and
.
Let us search for normal
modes of the general form
![]() |
(5.4) |
It follows, from the preceding analysis, that the longitudinal normal modes of a linear array of spring-coupled masses, the left end of which is free, and the right end fixed, are associated with the following characteristic displacement patterns,
where and the
![]() |
Figures 5.2 and 5.3 display the normal modes and normal
frequencies of a linear array of eight spring-coupled masses, the left end of which is free, and
the right end fixed. The data shown in these figures is obtained from Equations (5.7) and (5.8), respectively, with .
It can be seen that
normal modes with small wavenumbers—that is,
, so that
—have displacements
that vary in a fairly smooth sinusoidal manner from mass to mass, and oscillation frequencies
that increase approximately linearly with increasing wavenumber.
On the
other hand, normal modes with large wavenumbers—that is,
, so that
—have
displacements that exhibit large variations from mass to mass, and
oscillation frequencies that do not depend linearly on wavenumber. We conclude that
the longitudinal normal modes of an array of spring-coupled masses have analogous properties
to the transverse normal modes of a beaded string. (See Section 4.2.)
The dynamical system pictured in Figure 5.1 can be used to model the effect of a planar
sound wave (i.e., a longitudinal
oscillation in position that is periodic in space) on a crystal lattice. In this application, the masses represent parallel planes of atoms, the springs represent the interatomic forces acting between these planes, and the
longitudinal oscillations represent the sound wave. Of course, a macroscopic crystal
contains a great many atomic planes, so we would expect to be very large.
However, according to Equations (5.5) and (5.8),
no matter how large
becomes,
cannot exceed
(because
cannot exceed
), and
cannot exceed
. In other words, there is a minimum wavelength that
a sound wave in a crystal lattice can have, which turns out to be twice the
interplane spacing, and a corresponding maximum oscillation frequency.
For waves whose wavelengths are much greater than the interplane spacing (i.e.,
), the dispersion relation (5.6) reduces to