Next: Vector velocity and vector
Up: Motion in 3 dimensions
Previous: Scalar multiplication
The use of vectors is very well illustrated by the following rather famous proof
that the diagonals of a parallelogram mutually bisect one another.
Figure 13:
A parallelogram
|
Suppose that the quadrilateral ABCD in Fig. 13 is a parallelogram. It follows that
the opposite sides of ABCD can be represented by the
same vectors, and : this merely indicates that these sides are of
equal length and are parallel (i.e., they point in the same direction). Note that
Fig. 13 illustrates an important point regarding vectors. Although vectors possess
both a magnitude (length) and a direction, they possess no intrinsic position information.
Thus, since sides and are parallel and of equal length, they can be represented
by the same vector , despite the fact that they are in different places on the
diagram.
The diagonal in Fig. 13 can be represented vectorially as
.
Likewise, the diagonal can be written
.
The displacement (say) of the centroid from point can be written in one
of two different ways:
Equation (38) is interpreted as follows: in order to get from point to point ,
first move to point (along vector ), then move along diagonal (along
vector ) for an unknown fraction of its length.
Equation (39) is interpreted as follows: in order to get from point to point
, first move to point (along vector ), then move to point
(along vector ), finally move along diagonal (along vector
) for an unknown fraction of its length. Since represents the
same point in Eqs. (38) and (39), we can equate these two
expressions to give
|
(40) |
Now vectors and point in different directions, so the only way
in which the above expression can be satisfied, in general, is if the coefficients of
and match on either side of the equality sign. Thus,
equating coefficients of and , we obtain
It follows that
. In other words, the centroid is located at
the halfway points of diagonals and : i.e., the diagonals
mutually bisect one another.
Next: Vector velocity and vector
Up: Motion in 3 dimensions
Previous: Scalar multiplication
Richard Fitzpatrick
2006-02-02