Next: Particle in a box Up: Three-dimensional quantum mechanics Previous: Introduction   Contents

## Fundamental concepts

We have seen that in one dimension the instantaneous state of a single non-relativistic particle is fully specified by a complex wave-function, . The probability of finding the particle at time between and is , where
 (449)

Moreover, the wave-function is normalized such that
 (450)

at all times.

In three dimensions, the instantaneous state of a single particle is also fully specified by a complex wave-function, . By analogy with the one-dimensional case, the probability of finding the particle at time between and , between and , and between and , is , where

 (451)

As usual, this interpretation of the wave-function only makes sense if the wave-function is normalized such that
 (452)

This normalization constraint ensures that the probability of finding the particle anywhere is space is always unity.

In one dimension, we can write the probability conservation equation (see Sect. 4.5)

 (453)

where
 (454)

is the flux of probability along the -axis. Integrating Eq. (453) over all space, and making use of the fact that as if is to be square-integrable, we obtain
 (455)

In other words, if the wave-function is initially normalized then it stays normalized as time progresses. This is a necessary criterion for the viability of our basic interpretation of as a probability density.

In three dimensions, by analogy with the one dimensional case, the probability conservation equation becomes

 (456)

Here,
 (457)

is the flux of probability along the -axis, and
 (458)

the flux of probability along the -axis, etc. Integrating Eq. (456) over all space, and making use of the fact that as if is to be square-integrable, we obtain
 (459)

Thus, the normalization of the wave-function is again preserved as time progresses, as must be the case if is to be interpreted as a probability density.

In one dimension, position is represented by the algebraic operator , whereas momentum is represented by the differential operator (see Sect. 4.6). By analogy, in three dimensions, the Cartesian coordinates , , and are represented by the algebraic operators , , and , respectively, whereas the three Cartesian components of momentum, , , and , have the following representation:

 (460) (461) (462)

Let , , , and , etc. Since the are independent variables (i.e., ), we conclude that the various position and momentum operators satisfy the following commutation relations:

 (463) (464) (465)

Now, we know, from Sect. 4.10, that two dynamical variables can only be (exactly) measured simultaneously if the operators which represent them in quantum mechanics commute with one another. Thus, it is clear, from the above commutation relations, that the only restriction on measurement in a system consisting of a single particle moving in three dimensions is that it is impossible to simultaneously measure a given position coordinate and the corresponding component of momentum. Note, however, that it is perfectly possible to simultaneously measure two different positions coordinates, or two different components of the momentum. The commutation relations (463)-(465) again illustrate the point that quantum mechanical operators corresponding to different degrees of freedom of a dynamical system (in this case, motion in different directions) tend to commute with one another (see Sect. 6.2).

In one dimension, the time evolution of the wave-function is given by [see Eq. (181)]

 (466)

where is the Hamiltonian. The same equation governs the time evolution of the wave-function in three dimensions.

Now, in one dimension, the Hamiltonian of a non-relativistic particle of mass takes the form

 (467)

where is the potential energy. In three dimensions, this expression generalizes to
 (468)

Hence, making use of Eqs. (460)-(462) and (466), the three-dimensional version of the time-dependent Schröndiger equation becomes [see Eq. (119)]
 (469)

Here, the differential operator
 (470)

is known as the Laplacian. Incidentally, the probability conservation equation (456) is easily derivable from Eq. (469). An eigenstate of the Hamiltonian corresponding to the eigenvalue satisfies
 (471)

It follows from Eq. (466) that (see Sect. 4.12)
 (472)

where the stationary wave-function satisfies the three-dimensional version of the time-independent Schröndiger equation [see Eq. (277)]:
 (473)

where is assumed not to depend explicitly on .

Next: Particle in a box Up: Three-dimensional quantum mechanics Previous: Introduction   Contents
Richard Fitzpatrick 2006-12-12