Next: Hydrogen Molecule Ion Up: Variational Methods Previous: Variational Principle

# Helium Atom

A helium atom consists of a nucleus of charge surrounded by two electrons. Let us attempt to calculate its ground-state energy.

Let the nucleus lie at the origin of our coordinate system, and let the position vectors of the two electrons be and , respectively. The Hamiltonian of the system thus takes the form

 (1180)

where we have neglected any reduced mass effects. The terms in the above expression represent the kinetic energy of the first electron, the kinetic energy of the second electron, the electrostatic attraction between the nucleus and the first electron, the electrostatic attraction between the nucleus and the second electron, and the electrostatic repulsion between the two electrons, respectively. It is the final term which causes all of the difficulties. Indeed, if this term is neglected then we can write
 (1181)

where
 (1182)

In other words, the Hamiltonian just becomes the sum of separate Hamiltonians for each electron. In this case, we would expect the wavefunction to be separable: i.e.,
 (1183)

Hence, Schrödinger's equation
 (1184)

reduces to
 (1185)

where
 (1186)

Of course, Eq. (1185) is the Schrödinger equation of a hydrogen atom whose nuclear charge is , instead of . It follows, from Sect. 9.4 (making the substitution ), that if both electrons are in their lowest energy states then
 (1187) (1188)

where
 (1189)

Here, is the Bohr radius [see Eq. (679)]. Note that is properly normalized. Furthermore,
 (1190)

where is the hydrogen ground-state energy [see Eq. (678)]. Thus, our crude estimate for the ground-state energy of helium becomes
 (1191)

Unfortunately, this estimate is significantly different from the experimentally determined value, which is . This fact demonstrates that the neglected electron-electron repulsion term makes a large contribution to the helium ground-state energy. Fortunately, however, we can use the variational principle to estimate this contribution.

Let us employ the separable wavefunction discussed above as our trial solution. Thus,

 (1192)

The expectation value of the Hamiltonian (1180) thus becomes
 (1193)

where
 (1194)

The variation principle only guarantees that (1193) yields an upper bound on the ground-state energy. In reality, we hope that it will give a reasonably accurate estimate of this energy.

It follows from Eqs. (678), (1192) and (1194) that

 (1195)

where . Neglecting the hats, for the sake of clarity, the above expression can also be written
 (1196)

where is the angle subtended between vectors and . If we perform the integral in space before that in space then
 (1197)

where
 (1198)

Our first task is to evaluate the function . Let be a set of spherical polar coordinates in space whose axis of symmetry runs in the direction of . It follows that . Hence,

 (1199)

which trivially reduces to
 (1200)

Making the substitution , we can see that
 (1201)

Now,
 (1202)

giving
 (1203)

But,
 (1204) (1205)

yielding
 (1206)

Since the function only depends on the magnitude of , the integral (1197) reduces to

 (1207)

which yields
 (1208)

Hence, from (1193), our estimate for the ground-state energy of helium is
 (1209)

This is remarkably close to the correct result.

We can actually refine our estimate further. The trial wavefunction (1192) essentially treats the two electrons as non-interacting particles. In reality, we would expect one electron to partially shield the nuclear charge from the other, and vice versa. Hence, a better trial wavefunction might be

 (1210)

where is effective nuclear charge number seen by each electron. Let us recalculate the ground-state energy of helium as a function of , using the above trial wavefunction, and then minimize the result with respect to . According to the variational principle, this should give us an even better estimate for the ground-state energy.

We can rewrite the expression (1180) for the Hamiltonian of the helium atom in the form

 (1211)

where
 (1212)

is the Hamiltonian of a hydrogen atom with nuclear charge ,
 (1213)

is the electron-electron repulsion term, and
 (1214)

It follows that
 (1215)

where is the ground-state energy of a hydrogen atom with nuclear charge , is the value of the electron-electron repulsion term when recalculated with the wavefunction (1210) [actually, all we need to do is to make the substitution ], and
 (1216)

Here, is the expectation value of calculated for a hydrogen atom with nuclear charge . It follows from Eq. (695) [with , and making the substitution ] that
 (1217)

Hence,
 (1218)

since . Collecting the various terms, our new expression for the expectation value of the Hamiltonian becomes
 (1219)

The value of which minimizes this expression is the root of
 (1220)

It follows that
 (1221)

The fact that confirms our earlier conjecture that the electrons partially shield the nuclear charge from one another. Our new estimate for the ground-state energy of helium is
 (1222)

This is clearly an improvement on our previous estimate (1209) [recall that the correct result is eV].

Obviously, we could get even closer to the correct value of the helium ground-state energy by using a more complicated trial wavefunction with more adjustable parameters.

Note, finally, that since the two electrons in a helium atom are indistinguishable fermions, the overall wavefunction must be anti-symmetric with respect to exchange of particles (see Sect. 6). Now, the overall wavefunction is the product of the spatial wavefunction and the spinor representing the spin-state. Our spatial wavefunction (1210) is obviously symmetric with respect to exchange of particles. This means that the spinor must be anti-symmetric. It is clear, from Sect. 11.4, that if the spin-state of an system consisting of two spin one-half particles (i.e., two electrons) is anti-symmetric with respect to interchange of particles then the system is in the so-called singlet state with overall spin zero. Hence, the ground-state of helium has overall electron spin zero.

Next: Hydrogen Molecule Ion Up: Variational Methods Previous: Variational Principle
Richard Fitzpatrick 2010-07-20