Next: The Born approximation
Up: Scattering theory
Previous: Introduction
Consider time-independent scattering theory, for which the Hamiltonian
of the system is written
 |
(891) |
where
is the Hamiltonian of a free particle of mass
,
 |
(892) |
and
represents the non-time-varying source of the scattering. Let
be an energy eigenket of
,
 |
(893) |
whose wave-function
is
. This state is a plane-wave state or, possibly, a
spherical-wave state.
Schrödinger's equation for the scattering problem is
 |
(894) |
where
is an energy eigenstate of the total Hamiltonian
whose wave-function
is
.
In general, both
and
have continuous energy
spectra: i.e., their energy eigenstates are unbound.
We require a solution of Eq. (894) which satisfies the
boundary condition
as
. Here,
is a solution of the free particle
Schrödinger equation, (893), corresponding to the same energy eigenvalue.
Formally, the desired solution can be written
 |
(895) |
Note that we can recover Eq. (894) by operating on the above equation
with
, and making use of Eq. (893). Furthermore, the solution
satisfies the boundary condition
as
. Unfortunately, the operator
is singular: i.e., it produces infinities when it
operates on an eigenstate of
corresponding to the eigenvalue
.
We need a prescription for dealing with these infinities,
otherwise the above solution is useless. The standard prescription is
to make the energy eigenvalue
slightly complex. Thus,
 |
(896) |
where
is real, positive, and small. Equation (896) is called
the Lipmann-Schwinger equation, and is non-singular
as long as
. The physical significance of the
signs will become apparent later on.
The Lipmann-Schwinger equation can be converted into an integral
equation via left multiplication by
. Thus,
 |
(897) |
Adopting the Schrödinger representation, we can write the scattering
problem (894) in the form
 |
(898) |
where
 |
(899) |
This equation is called Helmholtz's equation, and can be inverted
using standard Green's function techniques. Thus,
 |
(900) |
where
 |
(901) |
Note that the solution (900) satisfies the boundary condition
as
.
As is well-known, the Green's function for the Helmholtz problem is
given by
 |
(902) |
Thus, Eq. (900) becomes
 |
(903) |
A comparison of Eqs. (897) and (903) suggests that the kernel to Eq. (897)
takes the form
 |
(904) |
It is not entirely clear that the
signs correspond on both sides
of this equation. In fact, they do, as is easily proved by a more rigorous
derivation of this result.
Let us suppose that the scattering Hamiltonian,
, is only a function
of the position operators. This implies that
 |
(905) |
We can write
Thus, the integral equation (903) simplifies to
 |
(907) |
Suppose that the initial state
is a plane-wave with wave-vector
(i.e., a stream of particles of
definite momentum
). The ket corresponding to
this state is denoted
. The associated wave-function
takes the form
 |
(908) |
The wave-function is normalized such that
Suppose that the scattering potential
is only non-zero in some
relatively localized region centred on the origin (
).
Let us calculate the wave-function
a long way from
the scattering region. In other words, let us adopt the ordering
. It is easily demonstrated that
 |
(910) |
to first-order in
, where
 |
(911) |
is a unit vector which points from the scattering region to the
observation point. Let us define
 |
(912) |
Clearly,
is the wave-vector for particles which possess the
same energy as the incoming particles (i.e.,
), but propagate
from the scattering region to the observation point. Note that
 |
(913) |
In the large-
limit, Eq. (907) reduces to
 |
(914) |
The first term on the right-hand side is the incident wave. The second term
represents a spherical wave centred on the scattering region. The
plus sign (on
) corresponds to a wave propagating away from the
scattering region, whereas the minus sign corresponds to a
wave propagating towards the scattering region. It is obvious that
the former represents the physical solution.
Thus, the wave-function a long way from the scattering region can be
written
![\begin{displaymath}
\psi({\bf r}) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{3/2}} \left[\exp( {\rm i}\...
... + \frac{\exp( {\rm i} kr)}{r} f({\bf k}', {\bf k}) \right],
\end{displaymath}](img1972.png) |
(915) |
where
Let us define the differential cross-section
as
the number of particles per unit time scattered into an element of
solid angle
, divided by the incident flux of particles.
Recall, from Sect. 4, that the probability flux
(i.e., the particle flux) associated with a
wave-function
is
 |
(917) |
Thus, the probability flux associated with the incident wave-function,
 |
(918) |
is
 |
(919) |
Likewise, the probability flux associated with the scattered wave-function,
 |
(920) |
is
 |
(921) |
Now,
 |
(922) |
giving
 |
(923) |
Thus,
gives the differential cross-section for particles with incident momentum
to be scattered
into states whose momentum vectors are directed in a range of solid angles
about
. Note that the scattered particles possess
the same energy as the incoming particles (i.e.,
). This is always
the case for scattering Hamiltonians of the form shown in Eq. (905).
Next: The Born approximation
Up: Scattering theory
Previous: Introduction
Richard Fitzpatrick
2006-02-16