next up previous
Next: The Born approximation Up: Scattering theory Previous: Introduction

The Lipmann-Schwinger equation

Consider time-independent scattering theory, for which the Hamiltonian of the system is written
\begin{displaymath}
H= H_0 + H_1,
\end{displaymath} (891)

where $H_0$ is the Hamiltonian of a free particle of mass $m$,
\begin{displaymath}
H_0 = \frac{p^2}{2 m},
\end{displaymath} (892)

and $H_1$ represents the non-time-varying source of the scattering. Let $\vert\phi\rangle$ be an energy eigenket of $H_0$,
\begin{displaymath}
H_0  \vert\phi\rangle = E  \vert\phi\rangle,
\end{displaymath} (893)

whose wave-function $\langle {\bf r}'\vert\phi\rangle$ is $\phi({\bf r}')$. This state is a plane-wave state or, possibly, a spherical-wave state. Schrödinger's equation for the scattering problem is
\begin{displaymath}
(H_0 + H_1) \vert\psi\rangle = E \vert\psi\rangle,
\end{displaymath} (894)

where $\vert\psi\rangle$ is an energy eigenstate of the total Hamiltonian whose wave-function $\langle {\bf r}'\vert\psi\rangle$ is $\psi({\bf r}')$. In general, both $H_0$ and $H_0+H_1$ have continuous energy spectra: i.e., their energy eigenstates are unbound. We require a solution of Eq. (894) which satisfies the boundary condition $\vert\psi\rangle \rightarrow \vert\phi\rangle$ as $H_1\rightarrow 0$. Here, $\vert\phi\rangle$ is a solution of the free particle Schrödinger equation, (893), corresponding to the same energy eigenvalue.

Formally, the desired solution can be written

\begin{displaymath}
\vert\psi\rangle =\vert\phi\rangle +\frac{1}{E-H_0}  H_1 \vert\psi\rangle.
\end{displaymath} (895)

Note that we can recover Eq. (894) by operating on the above equation with $E-H_0$, and making use of Eq. (893). Furthermore, the solution satisfies the boundary condition $\vert\psi\rangle \rightarrow \vert\phi\rangle$ as $H_1\rightarrow 0$. Unfortunately, the operator $(E-H_0)^{-1}$ is singular: i.e., it produces infinities when it operates on an eigenstate of $H_0$ corresponding to the eigenvalue $E$. We need a prescription for dealing with these infinities, otherwise the above solution is useless. The standard prescription is to make the energy eigenvalue $E$ slightly complex. Thus,
\begin{displaymath}
\vert\psi^\pm\rangle =\vert\phi\rangle +\frac{1}{E-H_0\pm {\rm i} \epsilon}
 H_1 \vert\psi^\pm\rangle,
\end{displaymath} (896)

where $\epsilon$ is real, positive, and small. Equation (896) is called the Lipmann-Schwinger equation, and is non-singular as long as $\epsilon >0$. The physical significance of the $\pm$ signs will become apparent later on.

The Lipmann-Schwinger equation can be converted into an integral equation via left multiplication by $\langle{\bf r}\vert$. Thus,

\begin{displaymath}
\psi^\pm({\bf r}) = \phi({\bf r})
+\int \left\langle{\bf r}\...
...le \langle {\bf r}'\vert H_1\vert\psi^\pm\rangle d^3{\bf r}'.
\end{displaymath} (897)

Adopting the Schrödinger representation, we can write the scattering problem (894) in the form
\begin{displaymath}
(\nabla^2 + k^2) \psi({\bf r}) = \frac{2 m}{\hbar^2} \langle {\bf r} \vert H_1\vert
\psi\rangle,
\end{displaymath} (898)

where
\begin{displaymath}
E = \frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2 m}.
\end{displaymath} (899)

This equation is called Helmholtz's equation, and can be inverted using standard Green's function techniques. Thus,
\begin{displaymath}
\psi({\bf r}) = \phi({\bf r}) + \frac{2 m}{\hbar^2} \int G(...
...r'})
\langle {\bf r}' \vert H_1\vert\psi\rangle  d^3{\bf r}',
\end{displaymath} (900)

where
\begin{displaymath}
(\nabla^2 + k^2) G({\bf r}, {\bf r}') = \delta({\bf r} -{\bf r}').
\end{displaymath} (901)

Note that the solution (900) satisfies the boundary condition $\vert\psi\rangle \rightarrow \vert\phi\rangle$ as $H_1\rightarrow 0$. As is well-known, the Green's function for the Helmholtz problem is given by
\begin{displaymath}
G({\bf r}, {\bf r}') = -\frac{\exp(\pm {\rm i} k 
\vert{\bf r} - {\bf r}'\vert )}{4\pi \vert{\bf r} - {\bf r}'\vert}.
\end{displaymath} (902)

Thus, Eq. (900) becomes
\begin{displaymath}
\psi^\pm({\bf r}) = \phi({\bf r}) - \frac{2 m}{\hbar^2} \in...
...t}  \langle {\bf r}' \vert H_1\vert\psi\rangle  d^3{\bf r}'.
\end{displaymath} (903)

A comparison of Eqs. (897) and (903) suggests that the kernel to Eq. (897) takes the form
\begin{displaymath}
\left\langle{\bf r}\left\vert\frac{1}{E-H_0\pm {\rm i} \ep...
...f r} - {\bf r}'\vert )}{4\pi \vert{\bf r} - {\bf r}'\vert} .
\end{displaymath} (904)

It is not entirely clear that the $\pm$ signs correspond on both sides of this equation. In fact, they do, as is easily proved by a more rigorous derivation of this result.

Let us suppose that the scattering Hamiltonian, $H_1$, is only a function of the position operators. This implies that

\begin{displaymath}
\langle {\bf r}'\vert H_1\vert{\bf r}\rangle = V({\bf r})  \delta({\bf r} -{\bf r}').
\end{displaymath} (905)

We can write
$\displaystyle \langle {\bf r}'\vert H_1\vert \psi^\pm\rangle$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle \int \langle
{\bf r}'\vert H_1\vert{\bf r}''\rangle \langle {\bf r}'' \vert\psi^\pm\rangle 
d^3{\bf r}''$  
  $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle V({\bf r}')  \psi^\pm ({\bf r}').$ (906)

Thus, the integral equation (903) simplifies to
\begin{displaymath}
\psi^\pm({\bf r}) = \phi({\bf r}) - \frac{2 m}{\hbar^2} \in...
...\bf r}'\vert}  V({\bf r}') 
\psi^\pm({\bf r'}) d^3{\bf r}'.
\end{displaymath} (907)

Suppose that the initial state $\vert\phi\rangle$ is a plane-wave with wave-vector ${\bf k}$ (i.e., a stream of particles of definite momentum ${\bf p} = \hbar  {\bf k}$). The ket corresponding to this state is denoted $\vert{\bf k}\rangle$. The associated wave-function takes the form

\begin{displaymath}
\langle {\bf r} \vert {\bf k}\rangle = \frac{
\exp( {\rm i} {\bf k}\!\cdot\!{\bf r}) }{(2\pi)^{3/2}}.
\end{displaymath} (908)

The wave-function is normalized such that
$\displaystyle \langle {\bf k}\vert{\bf k}'\rangle$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle \int \langle {\bf k}\vert{\bf r}\rangle
\langle {\bf r} \vert{\bf k}'\rangle d^3{\bf r}$  
  $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle \int \frac{ \exp[-{\rm i}  {\bf r}\!\cdot\!({\bf k} -{\bf k}')]}
{(2\pi )^3}  d^3{\bf r} = \delta ({\bf k} - {\bf k'}).$ (909)

Suppose that the scattering potential $V({\bf r})$ is only non-zero in some relatively localized region centred on the origin (${\bf r} = 0$). Let us calculate the wave-function $\psi({\bf r})$ a long way from the scattering region. In other words, let us adopt the ordering $r\gg r'$. It is easily demonstrated that

\begin{displaymath}
\vert{\bf r} - {\bf r}'\vert \simeq r - \hat{{\bf r}}\!\cdot\!{\bf r}'
\end{displaymath} (910)

to first-order in $r'/r$, where
\begin{displaymath}
\hat{{\bf r}} = \frac{\bf r}{r}
\end{displaymath} (911)

is a unit vector which points from the scattering region to the observation point. Let us define
\begin{displaymath}
{\bf k}' = k \hat{{\bf r}}.
\end{displaymath} (912)

Clearly, ${\bf k}'$ is the wave-vector for particles which possess the same energy as the incoming particles (i.e., $k'=k$), but propagate from the scattering region to the observation point. Note that
\begin{displaymath}
\exp(\pm {\rm i}  k \vert{\bf r} - {\bf r'} \vert ) \sime...
...rm i}  k  r) \exp(\mp {\rm i}  {\bf k}'\!\cdot \!{\bf r}').
\end{displaymath} (913)

In the large-$r$ limit, Eq. (907) reduces to

\begin{displaymath}
\psi({\bf r})^\pm \simeq \frac{\exp( {\rm i} {\bf k}\!\cdo...
... \!{\bf r}') 
V({\bf r}')  \psi^\pm ({\bf r}') d^3{\bf r}'.
\end{displaymath} (914)

The first term on the right-hand side is the incident wave. The second term represents a spherical wave centred on the scattering region. The plus sign (on $\psi^\pm$) corresponds to a wave propagating away from the scattering region, whereas the minus sign corresponds to a wave propagating towards the scattering region. It is obvious that the former represents the physical solution. Thus, the wave-function a long way from the scattering region can be written
\begin{displaymath}
\psi({\bf r}) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{3/2}} \left[\exp( {\rm i}\...
... + \frac{\exp( {\rm i} kr)}{r} f({\bf k}', {\bf k}) \right],
\end{displaymath} (915)

where
$\displaystyle f({\bf k}', {\bf k})$ $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle - \frac{(2\pi)^2  m}{\hbar^2} \int
\frac{\exp(-{\rm i} {\bf k}'\!\cdot \! {\bf r}' ) }{(2\pi)^{3/2}}  V({\bf r}') \psi({\bf r}')  d^3{\bf r}'$  
  $\textstyle =$ $\displaystyle - \frac{(2\pi)^2  m}{\hbar^2}  \langle {\bf k}'\vert H_1\vert\psi\rangle.$ (916)

Let us define the differential cross-section $d\sigma/d\Omega$ as the number of particles per unit time scattered into an element of solid angle $d\Omega$, divided by the incident flux of particles. Recall, from Sect. 4, that the probability flux (i.e., the particle flux) associated with a wave-function $\psi$ is

\begin{displaymath}
{\bf j} = \frac{\hbar}{m} {\rm Im}(\psi^\ast  \nabla \psi).
\end{displaymath} (917)

Thus, the probability flux associated with the incident wave-function,
\begin{displaymath}
\frac{ \exp( {\rm i}  {\bf k}\!\cdot\!{\bf r})}{(2\pi)^{3/2}},
\end{displaymath} (918)

is
\begin{displaymath}
{\bf j}_{\rm inci} = \frac{\hbar}{(2\pi)^{3} m}  {\bf k}.
\end{displaymath} (919)

Likewise, the probability flux associated with the scattered wave-function,
\begin{displaymath}
\frac{ \exp( {\rm i}  k r)}{(2\pi)^{3/2}}\frac{
f({\bf k}', {\bf k})}{r},
\end{displaymath} (920)

is
\begin{displaymath}
{\bf j}_{\rm scat}=\frac{\hbar}{(2\pi)^{3} m}
\frac{\vert f( {\bf k}', {\bf k})\vert^2}{r^2}   k  \hat{\bf r}.
\end{displaymath} (921)

Now,
\begin{displaymath}
\frac{d\sigma}{d \Omega}  d\Omega =
\frac{ r^2 d\Omega   \vert{\bf j}_{\rm scat}\vert}{\vert{\bf j}_{\rm inci}\vert},
\end{displaymath} (922)

giving
\begin{displaymath}
\frac{d\sigma}{d \Omega} = \vert f({\bf k}', {\bf k})\vert^2.
\end{displaymath} (923)

Thus, $\vert f({\bf k}', {\bf k})\vert^2$ gives the differential cross-section for particles with incident momentum $\hbar { \bf k}$ to be scattered into states whose momentum vectors are directed in a range of solid angles $d\Omega$ about $\hbar { \bf k}'$. Note that the scattered particles possess the same energy as the incoming particles (i.e., $k'=k$). This is always the case for scattering Hamiltonians of the form shown in Eq. (905).


next up previous
Next: The Born approximation Up: Scattering theory Previous: Introduction
Richard Fitzpatrick 2006-02-16