Next: Spin angular momentum
Up: Angular momentum
Previous: Motion in a central
Energy levels of the hydrogen atom
Consider a hydrogen atom, for which the potential takes the specific form
 |
(403) |
The radial eigenfunction
satisfies Eq. (402), which can be written
![\begin{displaymath}
\left[\frac{\hbar^2}{2 \mu} \left(-\frac{1}{r^2} \frac{d}{d...
...)}{r^2}\right) -\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r}- E\right] R = 0.
\end{displaymath}](img827.png) |
(404) |
Here,
is the reduced mass, which takes into
account the fact that the electron (of mass
) and the proton (of mass
)
both rotate about a common centre, which is equivalent to a particle of
mass
rotating about a fixed point. Let us write the product
as the function
. The above equation transforms to
 |
(405) |
which is the one-dimensional Schrödinger equation for a particle of
mass
moving in the effective potential
 |
(406) |
The effective potential has a simple physical interpretation. The first part is the
attractive Coulomb potential, and the second part corresponds
to the repulsive centrifugal force.
Let
 |
(407) |
and
, with
 |
(408) |
Here, it is assumed that the energy eigenvalue
is negative.
Equation (405) transforms to
 |
(409) |
Let us look for a power-law solution of the form
 |
(410) |
Substituting this solution into Eq. (409), we obtain
 |
(411) |
Equating the coefficients of
gives
![\begin{displaymath}
c_n[ n (n-1) - l (l+1) ] = c_{n-1} \left [2 (n-1) - \frac{2 \mu e^2 a}{4\pi \epsilon_0 \hbar^2}\right].
\end{displaymath}](img843.png) |
(412) |
Now, the power law series (410) must terminate at small
, at some positive
value of
, otherwise
behaves unphysically as
. This
is only possible if
, where
the first term in the series is
. There
are two possibilities:
or
. The
former predicts unphysical behaviour of the wave-function at
.
Thus, we conclude that
. Note that for an
state
there is a finite probability of finding the electron at the nucleus,
whereas for an
state there is zero probability of finding
the electron at the nucleus (i.e.,
at
, except when
). Note, also, that it is only possible to obtain sensible behaviour of the
wave-function as
if
is an integer.
For large values of
, the ratio of successive terms in the series
(410) is
 |
(413) |
according to Eq. (412). This is the same as the ratio of
successive terms in the series
 |
(414) |
which converges to
. We conclude that
as
. It follows from Eq. (408) that
as
. This does not correspond to
physically acceptable behaviour of the wave-function, since
must be finite. The only way in which we can avoid this unphysical
behaviour is if the series (410) terminates at some maximum value of
.
According to the recursion relation (412), this is only possible
if
 |
(415) |
where the last term in the series is
. It follows from Eq. (407)
that the energy eigenvalues are quantized, and can only take the values
 |
(416) |
Here,
is a positive integer which must exceed the quantum number
,
otherwise there would be no terms in the series (410).
It is clear that the wave-function for a hydrogen atom can be written
 |
(417) |
where
 |
(418) |
and
is a well-behaved solution of the differential equation
 |
(419) |
Finally, the
are spherical harmonics. The restrictions on the quantum numbers
are
. Here,
is a positive integer,
is
a non-negative integer, and
is an integer.
The ground state of hydrogen corresponds to
. The only permissible values
of the other quantum numbers are
and
. Thus, the ground state is
a spherically symmetric, zero angular momentum state. The energy of the
ground state is
 |
(420) |
The next energy level corresponds to
. The other quantum numbers are
allowed to take the values
,
or
,
. Thus, there are
states with non-zero angular momentum. Note that the energy levels given
in Eq. (416) are independent of the quantum number
, despite the fact that
appears in the radial eigenfunction equation (419). This is a special
property of a
Coulomb potential.
In addition to the quantized negative energy state of the
hydrogen atom, which we have just found, there
is also a continuum of unbound positive energy states.
Next: Spin angular momentum
Up: Angular momentum
Previous: Motion in a central
Richard Fitzpatrick
2006-02-16