Next: Schrödinger's representation - II
Up: Position and momentum
Previous: Wave-functions
Schrödinger's representation - I
Consider the simple system described in the previous section. A general
state ket can be written
, where
is a general function of
the position operator
, and
is the associated wave-function.
Consider the ket whose wave-function is
. This ket is
denoted
. The new ket is clearly a linear function of
the original ket, so we can think of it as the result of some linear
operator acting on
. Let us denote this operator
. It follows that
 |
(127) |
Any linear operator which acts on ket vectors can also act on bra vectors.
Consider
acting on a general bra
. According to
Eq. (34), the bra
satisfies
 |
(128) |
Making use of Eqs. (117) and (119), we can write
 |
(129) |
The right-hand side can be transformed via integration by parts to give
 |
(130) |
assuming that the contributions from the limits of integration vanish.
It follows that
 |
(131) |
which implies
 |
(132) |
The neglect of contributions from the limits of integration in Eq. (130) is
reasonable because
physical wave-functions are square-integrable [see Eq. (121)].
Note that
 |
(133) |
where use has been made of Eq. (132).
It follows, by comparison with Eqs. (35) and (126), that
 |
(134) |
Thus,
is an anti-Hermitian operator.
Let us evaluate the commutation relation between the operators
and
.
We have
 |
(135) |
Since this holds for any ket
, it follows that
 |
(136) |
Let
be the momentum conjugate to
(for the simple system under consideration
is a straight-forward linear momentum). According to Eq. (115),
and
satisfy the commutation relation
 |
(137) |
It can be seen, by comparison with Eq. (136), that
the Hermitian operator
satisfies the same commutation relation with
that
does.
The most general conclusion which may be drawn from a comparison of Eqs. (136)
and (137) is that
 |
(138) |
since (as is easily demonstrated) a general function
of the position
operator automatically commutes with
.
We have chosen to normalize the eigenkets and
eigenbras of the position operator so that they satisfy
the normalization condition (116). However, this choice of normalization does not
uniquely determine the eigenkets and
eigenbras. Suppose that we transform to a new
set of eigenbras which are related to the old set via
 |
(139) |
where
is a real function of
.
This transformation amounts to a rearrangement of the relative
phases of the eigenbras. The new
normalization condition is
Thus, the new eigenbras satisfy the same normalization condition
as the old eigenbras.
By definition, the standard ket
satisfies
.
It follows from Eq. (139) that the new standard ket is related to the
old standard ket via
 |
(141) |
where
is a real function of the position operator
.
The dual of the above equation yields the transformation rule for
the standard bra,
 |
(142) |
The transformation rule for a general operator
follows from Eqs. (141) and (142),
plus the requirement that the triple product
remain
invariant (this must be the case, otherwise the probability of a measurement
yielding a certain result would depend on the choice of eigenbras). Thus,
 |
(143) |
Of course, if
commutes with
then
is invariant under the transformation.
In fact,
is the only operator (we know of) which does not commute
with
, so Eq. (143) yields
 |
(144) |
where the subscript ``old'' is taken as read. It follows, from Eq. (138), that
the momentum operator
can be written
 |
(145) |
Thus, the special choice
 |
(146) |
yields
 |
(147) |
Equation (146) fixes
to
within an arbitrary additive constant: i.e., the special eigenkets and eigenbras
for which Eq. (147) is true are determined to within an arbitrary common phase-factor.
In conclusion, it is possible to find a set of basis eigenkets and eigenbras
of the position operator
which satisfy the normalization condition (116),
and for which the momentum conjugate to
can be represented as the operator
 |
(148) |
A general state ket is written
, where the standard ket
satisfies
, and where
is the wave-function.
This scheme of things is known as Schrödinger's representation, and is the
basis of wave mechanics.
Next: Schrödinger's representation - II
Up: Position and momentum
Previous: Wave-functions
Richard Fitzpatrick
2006-02-16