Up until the beginning of the 20th century, Newton's theory of motion
was thought to constitute a *complete* description of all types of
motion occurring in the Universe. We now know that this is not the
case. The modern view is that Newton's theory is only an *approximation* which is valid under certain circumstances.
The theory breaks down when the velocities of the objects under
investigation approach the speed of light in vacuum, and must be modified in accordance with Einstein's
*special theory of relativity*. The theory also fails in regions of space which are sufficiently curved that the propositions of Euclidean geometry
do not hold to a good approximation, and must be augmented by Einstein's *general theory
of relativity*.
Finally, the theory breaks down on atomic and subatomic length-scales, and must be replaced by *quantum mechanics*.
In this book, we shall neglect relativistic and quantum effects all together.
It follows that we must restrict our investigations to the motions of *large* (compared to an atom) *slow* (compared to the speed of light)
objects moving in *Euclidean* space. Fortunately, virtually all of the motions which we commonly observe in the world around us fall into
this category.

Newton very deliberately modeled his approach in the Principia on
that taken in *Euclid's Elements*.
Indeed, Newton's theory of motion has much in common with a conventional *axiomatic system* such as Euclidean geometry. Like all such systems, Newtonian dynamics starts from a set of terms that are *undefined* within the
system. In this case, the fundamental terms are *mass*, *position*,
*time*, and *force*. It is taken for granted that we understand what these terms mean,
and, furthermore, that they correspond to *measurable* quantities which
can be ascribed to, or associated with, objects in the world
around us. In particular, it is assumed that the ideas of position
in space, distance in space, and position as a function of time in space, are
correctly described by the Euclidean vector algebra and vector calculus discussed in the
previous chapter.
The next component
of an axiomatic system is a set of *axioms*. These are a set of
*unproven* propositions, involving the undefined terms, from which
all other propositions in the system can be derived via logic and mathematical
analysis. In the present case, the axioms are called *Newton's laws of
motion*, and can only be justified via experimental observation.
Note, incidentally, that Newton's laws, in their primitive form, are only applicable
to *point objects*. However, these laws can
be applied to extended objects by treating them as collections of point
objects.

One difference between an axiomatic system and a physical theory is that, in the latter case, even if a given prediction has been shown to follow necessarily from the axioms of the theory, it is still incumbent upon us to test the prediction against experimental observations. Lack of agreement might indicate faulty experimental data, faulty application of the theory (for instance, in the case of Newtonian dynamics, there might be forces at work which we have not identified), or, as a last resort, incorrectness of the theory. Fortunately, Newtonian dynamics has been found to give predictions which are in excellent agreement with experimental observations in all situations in which it is expected to be valid.

In the following, it is assumed that we know how to set up a rigid *Cartesian
frame of reference*, and how to measure the positions of point objects as
functions of time within that frame. It is also taken for granted that we have some basic
familiarity with the laws of mechanics, and standard mathematics up to, and including, calculus, as well
as
the vector analysis outlined in Appendix A.