Symmetry Requirements in Quantum Mechanics

(8.1) |

In particular, the probability of an observation of the system finding the th particle with coordinates in the range to , et cetera, is simply

(8.2) |

One of the fundamental postulates of quantum mechanics is the essential indistinguishability of particles of the same species. What this means, in practice, is that we cannot label particles of the same species. In other words, a proton is just a proton--we cannot meaningfully talk of proton number 1, or proton number 2, et cetera. Note that no such constraint arises in classical mechanics. Thus, in classical mechanics, particles of the same species are regarded as being distinguishable, and can, therefore, be labelled. Of course, the quantum-mechanical approach is the correct one.

Suppose that we interchange the th and th particles: that is,

(8.3) | ||

(8.4) |

If the particles are truly indistinguishable then nothing has changed. We have a particle in quantum state and a particle in quantum state both before and after the particles are swapped. Thus, the probability of observing the system in a given state also cannot have changed: that is,

Here, we have omitted the subscripts for the sake of clarity. Equation (8.5) implies that

where is a complex constant of modulus unity: that is, .

Suppose that we interchange the th and th particles a second time. Swapping the th and th particles twice leaves the system completely unchanged. In other words, it is equivalent to doing nothing at all to the system. Thus, the wavefunctions before and after this process must be identical. It follows from Equation (8.6) that

(8.7) |

Of course, the only solutions to the previous equation are .

We conclude, from the previous discussion, that the wavefunction, , is either completely symmetric under the interchange of identical particles, or it is completely anti-symmetric. In other words, either

or

In 1940, the Nobel prize-winning physicist Wolfgang Pauli demonstrated,
via arguments involving relativistic invariance, that
the wavefunction associated with a collection of
identical integer-spin (i.e., spin
, etc.)
particles satisfies Equation (8.8), whereas the wavefunction
associated with a collection of identical half-integer-spin
(i.e., spin
, etc.)
particles satisfies Equation (8.9). The former type of particles
are known as *bosons* [after the Indian physicist S.N. Bose, who
first put forward Equation (8.8) on empirical grounds].
The latter type of particles are called *fermions* (after the Italian
physicist Enrico Fermi, who first studied the properties of
fermion gases). Common examples of bosons are photons and
atoms.
Common examples of fermions are protons, neutrons, and electrons.

Consider a gas made up of identical bosons. Equation (8.8) implies that the interchange of any two particles does not lead to a new state of the system. Bosons must, therefore, be considered as genuinely indistinguishable when enumerating the different possible states of the gas. Note that Equation (8.8) imposes no restriction on how many particles can occupy a given single-particle quantum state, .

Consider a gas made up of identical fermions. Equation (8.9) implies that the interchange of any two particles does not lead to a new physical state of the system (because is invariant). Hence, fermions must also be considered genuinely indistinguishable when enumerating the different possible states of the gas. Consider the special case where particles and lie in the same quantum state. In this case, the act of swapping the two particles is equivalent to leaving the system unchanged, so

However, Equation (8.9) is also applicable, because the two particles are fermions. The only way in which Equations (8.9) and (8.10) can be reconciled is if

(8.11) |

wherever particles and lie in the same quantum state. This is another way of saying that it is impossible for any two particles in a gas of identical fermions to lie in the same single-particle quantum state. This proposition is known as the

Consider, for the sake of comparison, a gas made up of identical classical particles. In this case, the particles must be considered distinguishable when enumerating the different possible states of the gas. Furthermore, there are no constraints on how many particles can occupy a given quantum state.

According to the previous discussion, there are three different sets of rules
that can be used to enumerate the states of a gas made up of identical
particles. For a boson gas, the particles must be treated as
being indistinguishable, and there is no limit to how many particles
can occupy a given quantum state. This set of rules is called *Bose-Einstein
statistics*, after S.N. Bose and A. Einstein, who first developed them.
For a fermion gas, the particles must be treated as
being indistinguishable, and there can never be more than one particle in
any given quantum state. This set of rules is called *Fermi-Dirac
statistics*, after E. Fermi and P.A.M. Dirac, who first developed them.
Finally, for a classical gas, the particles
must be treated as
being distinguishable, and there is no limit to how many particles
can occupy a given quantum state. This set of rules is called
*Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics*, after J.C. Maxwell and L. Boltzmann,
who first developed them.