Next: Wavepackets
Up: Waveparticle duality
Previous: Classical particles
Contents
Just as lightwaves sometimes exhibit particlelike properties, it turns
out that massive particles sometimes exhibit wavelike properties.
For instance, it is possible to obtain a doubleslit interference pattern
from a stream of monoenergetic electrons passing through two closely
spaced narrow slits. Now, the
effective wavelength of the electrons can be determined by measuring the width of the light and
dark bands in the interference pattern [see Eq. (51)]. It is found that

(56) 
The same relation is found for other types of particles. The above
wavelength is called the de Broglie wavelength, after Louis de Broglie
who first suggested that particles should have wavelike properties in 1923.
Note that the de Broglie wavelength is generally pretty small. For instance,
that of an electron is

(57) 
where the electron energy is conveniently measured in units of electronvolts (eV).
(An electron accelerated from rest through a potential difference of 1000V
acquires an energy of 1000eV, and so on.) The de Broglie wavelength
of a proton is

(58) 
Given the smallness of the de Broglie wavelengths of common particles,
it is actually quite difficult to do particle interference experiments.
In general, in order to perform an effective interference experiment, the spacing
of the slits must not be too much greater than the wavelength of the wave.
Hence, particle interference experiments require either very low energy particles (since
), or very closely spaced slits. Usually
the ``slits'' consist of crystals, which act a bit like diffraction gratings
with a characteristic spacing of order the interatomic spacing (which is
generally about m).
Equation (56) can be rearranged to give

(59) 
which is exactly the same as the relation between momentum and
wavenumber that we obtained earlier for photons [see Eq. (45)].
Since the relation (45) between momentum and wavenumber applies to both photons and massive particles,
it seems plausible that the closely related relation (43)
between energy and wave angular frequency will also apply to both photons
and particles. If this is the case, and we can write

(60) 
for particle waves, then Eqs. (55) and (59) yield the
following dispersion relation for such waves:

(61) 
Now, we saw, in Sect. 3.2, that a planewave propagates at the
socalled phasevelocity,

(62) 
However, according to the above dispersion relation, a
particle planewave propagates at

(63) 
Note, from Eq. (54), that this is only half of the classical particle
velocity. Does this imply that the dispersion relation (61) is
incorrect? Let us investigate further.
Next: Wavepackets
Up: Waveparticle duality
Previous: Classical particles
Contents
Richard Fitzpatrick
20061212