where , , , and . Suppose that the final term on the right-hand side of the above expression were absent. In this case, the overall spatial wavefunction can be formed from products of hydrogen atom wavefunctions calculated with , instead of . Each of these wavefunctions is characterized by the usual triplet of quantum numbers, , , and . Now, the total spin of the system is a constant of the motion (since obviously commutes with the Hamiltonian), so the overall spin state is either the singlet or the triplet state. The corresponding spatial wavefunction is symmetric in the former case, and antisymmetric in the latter. Suppose that one electron has the quantum numbers , , whereas the other has the quantum numbers , , . The corresponding spatial wavefunction is

where the plus and minus signs correspond to the singlet and triplet spin states, respectively. Here, is a standard hydrogen atom wavefunction (calculated with ). For the special case in which the two sets of spatial quantum numbers, , , and , , , are the same, the triplet spin state does not exist (because the associated spatial wavefunction is null). Hence, only singlet spin state is allowed, and the spatial wavefunction reduces to

(1083) |

In particular, the ground state ( , , ) can only exist as a singlet spin state (i.e., a state of overall spin 0), and has the spatial wavefunction

where is the Bohr radius. This follows because

(1085) |

The energy of this state is

(1086) |

where is the ground state energy of a hydrogen atom. In the above expression, the factor of comes from the fact that there are two electrons in a helium atom.

The above estimate for the ground state energy of a helium atom completely ignores the final term on the right-hand side of Equation (1081), which describes the mutual interaction between the two electrons. We can obtain a better estimate for the ground state energy by treating (1084) as the unperturbed wavefunction, and as a perturbation. According to standard first-order perturbation theory, the correction to the ground state energy is

(1087) |

This can be written

(1088) |

since . Now,

(1089) |

where ( ) is the larger (smaller) of and , and is the angle subtended between and . Moreover, the so-called

(1090) |

However,

(1091) |

so we obtain

(1092) |

Here, and , and . Thus, our improved estimate for the ground state energy of the helium atom is

(1093) |

This is much closer to the experimental value of than our previous estimate.

Consider an excited state of the helium atom in which one electron is in the ground state, while the other is in a state characterized by the quantum numbers , , . We can write the energy of this state as

(1094) |

where is the energy of a hydrogen atom electron whose quantum numbers are , , . According to first-order perturbation theory, is the expectation value of . It follows from (1082) (with and ) that

where

(1096) | ||

(1097) |

Here, the plus sign in (1095) corresponds to the spin singlet state, whereas the minus sign corresponds to the spin triplet state. The integral --which is known as the

The fact that para-helium energy levels lie slightly above corresponding ortho-helium levels is interesting because our original Hamiltonian does not depend on spin. Nevertheless, there is a spin dependent effect--i.e., a helium atom has a lower energy when its electrons possess parallel spins--as a consequence of Fermi-Dirac statistics. To be more exact, the energy is lower in the spin triplet state because the corresponding spatial wavefunction is antisymmetric, causing the electrons to tend to avoid one another (thereby reducing their electrostatic repulsion).