(3.103) |

where , , and . The previous equation has the formal solution

where

and is a solution of

(3.106) |

Here, is an arbitrary fixed point. However, the solution (3.104) only makes sense in a region in which . To see this, let us imagine calculating the phase factor by evaluating the line integral specified in Equation (3.105) along two different paths, labelled 1 and 2, that join the points and . We find that

(3.107) |

where is the magnetic flux passing through a surface spanning the two paths. Here, we have made use of the curl theorem [92], as well as Equation (3.73). Thus, the phase factor is only independent of the choice of path in the line integral when . Such independence is required if we insist that the wavefunction be single valued.

Suppose that a charged particle moves in a magnetic-field-free region that is not simply connected, but surrounds a hole through which the magnetic flux passes. Upon completing a circuit around the hole, the particle's wavefunction is multiplied by . The requirement that the wavefunction be single-valued, and, hence, that the multiplication factor be unity, implies that the enclosed magnetic flux is quantized. In fact.

(3.108) |

where is an integer. This effect is known as

A situation like that just described arises in the motion of electrons in a superconducting ring through which a magnetic field passes. Incidentally, superconductors contain no internal magnetic fields because they expel magnetic flux--this
behavior is called the *Meissner effect* [72]. Experimentally, the magnetic flux passing through a
superconducting ring is found to satisfy

(3.109) |

where is an integer, and the magnitude of the electron charge [27,33]. This result is consistent with our present understanding of the phenomenon of superconductivity, according to which the fundamental charge carriers are correlated electron pairs known as

Consider an electron interference experiment in which a small solenoid containing magnetic flux is placed directly behind the slits of a two-slit interference apparatus. The interference pattern at the screen is due to the superposition of two parts of the wavefunction,

(3.110) |

where and are the wavefunctions due to electrons that originate from the source, pass through the first and second slits, respectively, and then strike the same point on the screen. When the solenoid is energized an additional phase shift is introduced between and , where is the net flux passing through the solenoid. In other words, the magnetic field internal to the solenoid affects the interference pattern seen on the screen, despite the fact that neither electron beam ever directly experiences a magnetic field (because the field is internal to the solenoid, and the two interfering beams are assumed to pass on either side of the solenoid.) This phenomena is known as the