Next: MHD dynamo theory
Up: Magnetohydrodynamic theory
Previous: The interplanetary magnetic field
Since the Sun is the best observed of any star, it is interesting to
ask what impact the solar wind has as far as solar, and stellar, evolution
are concerned. The most obvious question is whether the mass loss due
to the wind is significant, or not. Using typical measured values (i.e.,
a typical solar wind velocity and particle density at 1 AU of
and
, respectively),
the Sun is apparently losing mass at a rate of
per year, implying a time-scale for significant mass loss of
years, or some
times longer than the estimated
year
age of the Sun. Clearly, the mass carried off by the solar wind has a negligible
effect on the Sun's evolution. Note, however, that many other stars in the Galaxy
exhibit significant mass loss via stellar winds. This is particularly
the case for late-type stars.
Let us now consider the angular momentum carried off by the solar wind.
Angular momentum loss is a crucially important topic in astrophysics, since
only by losing angular momentum can large, diffuse objects, such as
interstellar gas clouds, collapse under the influence of gravity to produce
small, compact objects, such as stars and proto-stars. Magnetic fields
generally play a crucial role in angular momentum loss. This is certainly
the case for the solar wind, where the solar magnetic field enforces
co-rotation with the Sun out to the Alfvén radius,
. Thus, the
angular momentum carried away by a particle of mass
is
, rather than
. The angular momentum
loss time-scale is, therefore, shorter than the mass loss time-scale by a factor
, making the angular momentum loss time-scale
comparable to the solar lifetime. It is clear that magnetized stellar
winds represent a very important vehicle for angular momentum loss in the
universe. Let us investigate angular momentum loss via
stellar winds in more detail.
Under the assumption of spherical symmetry and steady flow, the azimuthal
momentum evolution equation for the solar wind, taking into account the
influence of the interplanetary magnetic field, is written
 |
(746) |
The constancy of the mass flux [see Eq. (720)] and the
dependence
of
[see Eq. (739)] permit the immediate integration of the
above equation to give
 |
(747) |
where
is the angular momentum per unit mass carried off by the solar wind.
In the presence of an azimuthal wind velocity, the magnetic field and
velocity components are related by an expression similar to Eq. (737):
 |
(748) |
The fundamental physics assumption underlying the above expression is
the absence of an electric field in the frame of reference co-rotating
with the Sun. Using Eq. (748) to eliminate
from Eq. (747), we obtain
(in the ecliptic plane, where
)
 |
(749) |
where
 |
(750) |
is the radial Alfvén Mach number. The radial Alfvén Mach number
is small near the base of the corona, and about 10 at 1 AU: it passes through
unity at the Alfvén radius,
, which is about
AU from the Sun.
The zero denominator on the right-hand side
of Eq. (749) at
implies that
is
finite and continuous only if the numerator is also zero at the Alfvén radius.
This condition then determines the angular momentum content of the outflow
via
 |
(751) |
Note that the angular momentum carried off by the solar wind is indeed
equivalent to that which would be carried off were coronal plasma to
co-rotate with the Sun out to the Alfvén radius, and subsequently outflow
at constant angular velocity. Of course, the solar wind does not actually
rotate rigidly with the Sun in the region
: much of the angular
momentum in this region is carried in the form of electromagnetic stresses.
It is easily demonstrated that the quantity
is a constant,
and can, therefore, be evaluated at
to give
 |
(752) |
where
. Equations (749), (751), and (752) can
be combined to give
 |
(753) |
In the limit
, we have
, so the above
expression yields
 |
(754) |
at large distances from the Sun. Recall, from Sect. 5.7, that if the coronal
plasma were to simply co-rotate with the Sun out to
, and experience
no torque beyond this radius, then we would expect
 |
(755) |
at large distances from the Sun.
The difference between the above two expressions is the factor
,
which is a correction for the angular momentum retained by the magnetic
field at large
.
The analysis presented above was first incorporated into a quantitative
coronal expansion model by Weber and Davis.23 The model of Weber and Davis is
very complicated. For instance, the solar wind is required to flow smoothly
through no less than three critical points. These are associated
with the sound speed (as in Parker's original model), the radial Alfvén
speed,
, (as described above), and the total
Alfvén speed,
. Nevertheless, the simplified analysis
outlined above captures all of the essential features of the outflow.
For instance, Fig. 22 shows a comparison between the large-
asymptotic
form for the azimuthal flow velocity predicted above [see Eq. (754)] and
that calculated by Weber and Davis, showing the close agreement between
the two.
Figure 22:
Comparison of asymptotic form for azimuthal flow velocity
of solar wind with Weber-Davis solution.
 |
Next: MHD dynamo theory
Up: Magnetohydrodynamic theory
Previous: The interplanetary magnetic field
Richard Fitzpatrick
2006-02-16