(1889) |

and

(1890) |

respectively. The radius vector is defined to extend from the retarded position of the charge to the field point, so that . (Note that this is the opposite convention to that adopted in Sections 12.18 and 12.19). It follows that

(1891) |

The field and the source point variables are connected by the retardation condition

(1892) |

The potentials generated by the charge are given by the Liénard-Wiechert formulae,

(1893) | ||

(1894) |

where is a function both of the field point and the source point variables. Recall that the Liénard-Wiechert potentials are valid for accelerating, as well as uniformly moving, charges.

The fields and are derived from the potentials in the usual manner:

However, the components of the gradient operator are partial derivatives at constant time, , and not at constant time, . Partial differentiation with respect to the compares the potentials at neighboring points at the same time, but these potential signals originate from the charge at different retarded times. Similarly, the partial derivative with respect to implies constant , and, hence, refers to the comparison of the potentials at a given field point over an interval of time during which the retarded coordinates of the source have changed. Because we only know the time variation of the particle's retarded position with respect to we must transform and to expressions involving and .

Now, because is assumed to be given as a function of , we have

(1897) |

which is a functional relationship between , , and . Note that

(1898) |

It follows that

(1899) |

where all differentiation is at constant . Thus,

giving

(1901) |

Similarly,

(1902) |

where denotes differentiation with respect to at constant . It follows that

(1903) |

so that

(1904) |

Equation (1897) yields

(1905) |

or

(1906) |

However,

(1907) |

and

(1908) |

Thus,

(1909) |

which reduces to

Similarly,

(1911) |

or

(1912) |

which reduces to

A comparison of Equations (1912) and (1915) yields

Thus, the magnetic field is always perpendicular to and the retarded radius vector . Note that all terms appearing in the previous formulae are retarded.

The electric field is composed of two separate parts. The first term
in Equation (1912) varies as
for large distances from the charge.
We can think of
as the *virtual present radius vector*:
that is, the radius vector directed from the position
the charge would occupy at time
if it had continued with
uniform velocity from its retarded position to the field point.
In terms of
, the
field is simply

We can rewrite the expression (1835) for the electric field generated by a uniformly moving charge in the form

(1916) |

where is the radius vector directed from the present position of the charge at time to the field point, and . For the case of uniform motion, the relationship between the retarded radius vector and the actual radius vector is simply

(1917) |

It is straightforward to demonstrate that

(1918) |

in this case. Thus, the electric field generated by a uniformly moving charge can be written

(1919) |

Because for the case of a uniformly moving charge, it is clear that Equation (1917) is equivalent to the electric field generated by a uniformly moving charge located at the position the charge would occupy if it had continued with uniform velocity from its retarded position.

The second term in Equation (1912),

is of order , and, therefore, represents a radiation field. Similar considerations hold for the two terms of Equation (1915).