Consider a three-dimensional system characterized by three independent Cartesian position coordinates (where runs from 1 to 3), with three corresponding conjugate momenta . These are represented by three commuting position operators , and three commuting momentum operators , respectively. The commutation relations satisfied by the position and momentum operators are [see Equation (116)]

It is helpful to denote as and as . The following useful formulae,

where and are functions that can be expanded as power series, are easily proved using the fundamental commutation relations, (251).

Let us now consider the three-dimensional motion of a free particle of mass in the Heisenberg picture. The Hamiltonian is assumed to have the same form as in classical physics: i.e.,

(254) |

In the following, all dynamical variables are assumed to be Heisenberg dynamical variables, although we will omit the subscript for the sake of clarity. The time evolution of the momentum operator follows from the Heisenberg equation of motion, (244). We find that

(255) |

since automatically commutes with any function of the momentum operators. Thus, for a free particle, the momentum operators are constants of the motion, which means that at all times (for is 1 to 3). The time evolution of the position operator is given by

(256) |

where use has been made of Equation (252). It follows that

(257) |

which is analogous to the equation of motion of a classical free particle. Note that even though

(258) |

where the position operators are evaluated at equal times, the

(259) |

Combining the above commutation relation with the uncertainty relation (83) yields

(260) |

This result implies that even if a particle is well-localized at , its position becomes progressively more uncertain with time. This conclusion can also be obtained by studying the propagation of wavepackets in wave mechanics.

Let us now add a potential to our free particle Hamiltonian:

(261) |

Here, is some (real) function of the operators. The Heisenberg equation of motion gives

(262) |

where use has been made of Equation (253). On the other hand, the result

(263) |

still holds, because the all commute with the new term, , in the Hamiltonian. We can use the Heisenberg equation of motion a second time to deduce that

(264) |

In vectorial form, this equation becomes

This is the quantum mechanical equivalent of Newton's second law of motion. Taking the expectation values of both sides with respect to a Heisenberg state ket that does

When written in terms of expectation values, this result is independent of whether we are using the Heisenberg or Schrödinger picture. By contrast, the operator equation (265) only holds if and are understood to be Heisenberg dynamical variables. Note that Equation (266) has no dependence on . In fact, it guarantees to us that the centre of a wavepacket always moves like a classical particle.