Next: Rotational Stability
Up: Rigid Body Motion
Previous: Eulerian Angles
Contents
Gyroscopic Precession
Let us now study the motion of a rotationally symmetric rigid top which
is free to turn about a fixed point (without friction), but which is
subject to a gravitational torque (see Fig. 44). Let the
-axis
coincide with the symmetry axis. Let the principal moment of inertia about the symmetry axis
be
, and let the other principal moments both take the value
.
Let the
-axis run vertically upward, and let the common origin,
, of the
fixed and body frames coincide with the fixed point about which the top
turns. Suppose that
the center of mass of the top lies a distance
along its axis for
, and
that the mass of the top is
. Let the symmetry axis of the
top subtend an angle
(which is an Eulerian angle) with
the upward vertical.
Figure 44:
A symmetric top.
 |
Consider an instant in time at which the Eulerian angle
is zero.
This implies that the
-axis is horizontal, as shown in the diagram.
The gravitational force, which acts at the
center of mass, thus exerts a torque
in the
-direction. Hence, the components of the torque in the body
frame are
The components of the angular velocity vector in the body frame
are given by Eqs. (607)-(609).
Thus, Euler's equations
(576)-(578) take the form:
where
 |
(632) |
where
is the angular velocity of the top.
Multiplying Eq. (630) by
, we obtain
 |
(633) |
where
 |
(634) |
According to Eqs. (631) and (633), the
two quantities
and
are constants
of the motion. These two quantities are the angular momenta of the
system about the
- and
-axis, respectively. They
are conserved because the gravitational torque has no component
along either the
- or the
-axis.
If there are no frictional forces acting on the top then the total
energy,
, is also a constant of the motion. Now,
 |
(635) |
When written in terms of the Eulerian angles (with
), this
becomes
 |
(636) |
Eliminating
between Eqs. (634) and (636),
we obtain the following differential equation for
:
 |
(637) |
Let
 |
(638) |
and
. It follows that
 |
(639) |
or
 |
(640) |
where
is a cubic polynomial. In principal, the above equation
can be integrated to give
(and, hence,
) as a function of
:
 |
(641) |
Fortunately, we do not have to perform the above integration (which is very ugly)
in order to discuss the general properties of the solution to
Eq. (640). It is clear, from Eq. (641), that
needs to be positive in order to obtain a physical solution. Hence, the
limits of the motion in
are determined by the three roots of the
equation
. Since
must lie between
and
,
it follows that
must lie between 0 and 1. It can easily be demonstrated that
as
. It can also be shown
that the
largest root
lies in the region
, and the two smaller
roots
and
(if they exist) lie in the region
.
It follows that, in the region
,
is only positive between
and
.
Figure 45 shows
a case where
and
lie in the range
0 to 1. The corresponding values of
--
and
, say--are then the limits of the vertical motion.
The axis of the top oscillates backward and forward between these two
values of
as the top precesses about the vertical axis. This
oscillation is called nutation. Incidentally, if
becomes
negative then the nutation will cause the top to strike the ground (assuming
that it is spinning on a level surface).
Figure 45:
The function
.
 |
If there is a double root of
(i.e., if
) then
there is no nutation, and the top precesses steadily. However, the
criterion for steady precession is most easily obtained directly from
Eq. (629). In the absence of nutation,
.
Hence, we obtain
 |
(642) |
or
 |
(643) |
The above equation is the criterion for steady precession.
Since the right-hand side of Eq. (643) possesses the minimum
value
, it follows that
 |
(644) |
is a necessary condition for obtaining steady precession at the
inclination angle
. For
, there are two
roots to Eq. (643), corresponding to a slow and a fast steady
precession rate for a given inclination angle
. If
then these two roots are approximately given by
The slower of these two precession rates is the one which is
generally observed.
Next: Rotational Stability
Up: Rigid Body Motion
Previous: Eulerian Angles
Contents
Richard Fitzpatrick
2008-01-13