Subsonic Flow Past a Wave-Shaped Wall

Here, is the amplitude of the modulation, whereas is the wavelength. In the limit , the unperturbed flow is of uniform speed , directed parallel to the -axis. The corresponding Mach number is . The fluid occupies the region .

The perturbed flow is governed by Equation (15.127),

and is subject to the boundary condition (15.129), which can be written

We also expect the perturbed flow to become vanishingly small far from the wall, which implies that

Consider subsonic flow, for which
.
Equation (15.131) is of the *elliptic* type

(15.134) |

(Arfken 1985). Let us search for a separable solution of the form

(15.135) |

We obtain

(15.136) |

where denotes derivative with respect to argument. Given that the left-hand side of the previous equation is a function of only, whereas the right-hand side is a function of only, the two sides must equal the same constant. In other words,

Here, the sign of the constant has been chosen so as to allow the boundary condition (15.133) to be satisfied. The most general solution of Equation (15.137) is

(15.139) |

where and are arbitrary constants. Likewise, the most general solution of Equation (15.138) is

(15.140) |

where and are arbitrary constants.

The boundary condition (15.133) implies that . The boundary condition (15.132) then yields

(15.141) |

This condition can only be satisfied at all if , , and . Thus, we obtain

According to Equation (15.128), the pressure coefficient at the wall can be written

It immediately follows that there is zero net drag force acting on the wall, because the pressure variations are in phase with the wall's sinusoidal modulations, and, hence, symmetrical about the crests and troughs.

Let us now consider under what circumstances the approximations made in the small-perturbation theory developed in the previous section are valid for the problem under investigation. In fact, small-perturbation theory is premised on three assumptions. First, that and . It is evident from Equations (15.143) and (15.144) that this assumption is valid provided

(15.146) |

Second, in Equation (15.110) it is assumed that

(15.147) |

which implies that

(15.148) |

Finally, in Equation (15.123), it is assumed that the second term on the right-hand side is negligible compared to the first, when evaluated at the surface of the wall, which implies that

(15.149) |

Hence, we deduce that the analysis described in this section is valid provided

(15.150) |