Next: Probability Interpretation of Wavefunction Up: Wave Mechanics Previous: Representation of Waves via

# Schrödinger's Equation

The basic premise of wave mechanics is that a massive particle of energy and linear momentum , moving in the -direction (say), can be represented by a one-dimensional complex wavefunction of the form

 (1094)

where the complex amplitude, , is arbitrary, while the wavenumber, , and the angular frequency, , are related to the particle momentum, , and energy, , via the fundamental relations (1082) and (1080), respectively. The previous one-dimensional wavefunction is the solution of a one-dimensional wave equation that determines how the wavefunction evolves in time. As described below, we can guess the form of this wave equation by drawing an analogy with classical physics.

A classical particle of mass , moving in a one-dimensional potential , satisfies the energy conservation equation

 (1095)

where

 (1096)

is the particle's kinetic energy (Fitzpatrick 2012). Hence,

 (1097)

is a valid, but not obviously useful, wave equation.

However, it follows from Equations (1080) and (1094) that

 (1098)

which can be rearranged to give

 (1099)

Likewise, from Equations (1082) and (1094),

 (1100)

which can be rearranged to give

 (1101)

Thus, combining Equations (1097), (1099), and (1101), we obtain

 (1102)

This equation, which is known as Schrödinger's equation--because it was first formulated by Erwin Schrödinder in 1926--is the fundamental equation of wave mechanics (Dirac 1982).

For a massive particle moving in free space (i.e., ), the complex wavefunction (1094) is a solution of Schrödinger's equation, (1102), provided

 (1103)

The previous expression can be thought of as the dispersion relation (see Section 5.1) for matter waves in free space. The associated phase velocity (see Section 7.2) is

 (1104)

where use has been made of Equation (1082). However, this phase velocity is only half the classical velocity, , of a massive (non-relativistic) particle.

Next: Probability Interpretation of Wavefunction Up: Wave Mechanics Previous: Representation of Waves via
Richard Fitzpatrick 2013-04-08