Next: Transformation of coordinates
Up: The Moon
Previous: Observational data
Now, ecliptic longitude,
, and latitude,
, are angular
coordinates in a Cartesian system, (
,
,
), centered on the
Earth, which is such that the
-
plane coincides with the
ecliptic plane, the
-axis points in the direction of the
vernal equinox, and the
-axis points in the direction of the
northern ecliptic pole (cf., Fig. 13). In fact,
,
, and
.
Here, the radial coordinate is given the default value 1, since it
cannot be determined via purely angular positional data.
Suppose that
the plane of the Moon's orbit around the Earth is inclined at an
angle
to the ecliptic plane, and that the direction to the
ascending node subtends an angle
with the
-axis--see Fig. 13. We can transform to a new coordinate system, (
,
,
), in which the Moon's orbit lies in the
-
plane. This
is achieved by first rotating anti-clockwise about the
-axis (looking
down the axis) by an angle
, and then rotating anti-clockwise
about the new
-axis (looking down the axis) by an angle
.
Let
and
be the new longitude and latitude,
respectively, in the (
,
,
) frame. By definition,
. Hence, standard matrix transformation theory yields
It is reasonable to assume that
exhibits a similar strong secular increase in time
to
--see Fig. 43. Hence, it follows,
from the above equations, that the
maximum and minimum values of the Moon's latitude in the (
,
,
) frame
are
and
, respectively.
Moreover, when the Moon passes through the ecliptic plane (
) from below then
its longitude satisfies
. Likewise, when it passes through the ecliptic plane from
above then
. Thus, by carefully examining data like that
shown in Figs. 43 and 44, and locating the zeros
and the maximal values of the ecliptic latitude,
, we can easily
determine the Moon's orbital inclination,
, and the longitude of its
ascending node,
.
Figure 45:
The inclination of the Moon's orbit to the ecliptic versus time.
 |
Figure 46:
The longitude of the ascending node of the Moon's orbit versus time.
 |
Figures 45 and 46 show
and
, determined via the
method discussed above, versus time, for the years 1995-2006.
It can be seen that the graph of orbital inclination,
, versus time consists of a constant
value, plus a small amplitude periodic oscillation. On the other hand, the graph of the longitude of
the ascending node versus time consists of a constant value,
plus a secular decrease, plus a small amplitude periodic oscillation.
It is a straight-forward task to fit curves to these two graphs. We find that
Thus, the orbital inclination executes small amplitude oscillations about a mean value of
,
with a period of
days. The longitude
of the ascending node exhibits a secular decrease, combined with a
small amplitude oscillation with the same period. The secular decrease is such as to
cause the longitude of the ascending node to execute a complete
retrograde (i.e., in the opposite sense to the orbital rotation) rotation in
days, which
is equivalent to
years.
Let us try to find a physical interpretation for Eqs. (74) and (75). Of course, the constant terms in these expressions require no
explanation. As has already been discussed, the secular decrease in
corresponds to a retrograde precession of the Moon's ascending
node with a period of
years. Now, it is well-known that external
gravitational perturbations cause the ascending nodes
and perihelions of Keplerian orbits to precess. For the
case of the planets, these precession rates are sufficiently small that
they can be ignored, unless one is following planetary motion over a
very long period of time. However, for the case of the Moon, the external
perturbation due to the Sun's gravitational influence is so large
that the associated precession of the ascending node
cannot be ignored. Indeed, this effect causes the Moon's ascending node to rotate by
a year.
We still need to account for the oscillatory components of Eqs. (74)
and (75). We propose that both of these terms can be written
in the form
![\begin{displaymath}
A\,\cos\left[2\,(\lambda_{\astrosun}-\theta-\phi)\right],
\end{displaymath}](img419.png) |
(76) |
where
is a constant amplitude,
the ecliptic
longitude of the Sun,
the longitude of the Moon's
ascending node, and
a constant phase-shift. It is
sufficient to evaluate the above expression using the longitude of the
mean Sun, and the non-oscillatory component of
:
i.e.,
Hence, expression (76) becomes
 |
(79) |
Note that the frequency in the above expression exactly matches that of the
oscillatory components of Eqs. (74) and (76). Thus, these equations can be rewritten in the form
where
years. We can now appreciate that the Sun's perturbing influence has two effects on the Moon's orbital inclination.
First, it causes a retrograde precession in the ascending node with
a period of
years. Second, it causes a slight wobble in the
orbital plane. The wobble executes two periods as the Sun makes a complete rotation with respect to the Moon's ascending node.
Figure 47:
The (
,
,
) and (
,
,
) coordinate systems. Here,
is the Earth,
the Moon,
the ascending node, and
the vernal equinox.
 |
Next: Transformation of coordinates
Up: The Moon
Previous: Observational data
Richard Fitzpatrick
2006-07-28